concurred to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "concurred to" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "concurred with" or "concurred in." Example: "The committee concurred with the proposed changes to the policy."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

30 human-written examples

Jack Shafer of Slate concurred: "To call the torrent of information about the Afghanistan war released by WikiLeaks a mere leak is to insult the gods of hydrodynamics".

The New York Times - Magazine

But all have also concurred, to varying degrees, that the current conditions (the tightest ever imposed in the UK) are both disproportionately punitive and, in terms of helping jobless people back to work, counterproductive.

The Guardian

Land subsidence and eustacy concurred to make the relative sea level in Venice Italyy) 23 cm higher over the last century.

Remote Sensing of Environment

Simulation of time distance curves of a modal hollow concrete block is generally concurred to the measured ground penetrating radar signal pattern.

Journal of Applied Geophysics

The strong expansion of hazelnut orchards concurred to the fragmentation of traditional rural landscape was dominated by vineyards, field crops and forests.

Land Use Policy

They notice that a distortive behaviour of retailers and food companies have concurred to enlarge the gap between farmers' and retailers' prices, and call for more research to evaluate buyers' power nature and causes.

Agricultural and Food Economics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

30 human-written examples

Why don't we all just concur to cede the honor to the classically trained, or to children?

The New Yorker

concurring to the overall performance.

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Three factors concur to effective learning: 1. Training set.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Several factors can concur to weaken the SSC tendon.

Insights into Imaging

The different observation methods and measurements concur to explain the nugget formation.

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to agreement in general, opt for more common and grammatically sound alternatives like "agreed with" or "consented to."

Common error

A frequent mistake is pairing "concurred" with the preposition "to" instead of the correct prepositions "with" or "in". Always double-check the preposition to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "concurred to" functions as a verb phrase where "concurred" is the past tense of the verb "concur". However, it's important to note that according to Ludwig AI, this specific construction is grammatically incorrect. It is found primarily in scientific writing.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

16%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "concurred to" appears in various contexts, especially within scientific literature, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The correct forms are "concurred with" or "concurred in," depending on whether you're expressing general agreement or agreement on a specific point. Given its frequency in science contexts, understanding the proper usage and suitable alternatives, such as "agreed with" or "consented to", is crucial for clear and accurate communication. Always prioritize grammatical correctness to maintain credibility, especially in formal or professional writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Concurred in

Uses the correct preposition, fixing the grammatical error.

Agreed with

Uses a more common and direct verb for expressing agreement.

Consented to

Implies giving permission or approval, adding a layer of authorization.

Saw eye to eye

Uses an idiomatic expression for complete agreement or shared perspective.

Coincided with

Emphasizes simultaneous occurrence or alignment of events, shifting the focus from agreement to parallel happening.

Subscribed to

Suggests adherence to a belief or principle, indicating a deeper level of commitment than simple agreement.

Assented to

Implies formal agreement, often used in legal or official contexts.

Acceded to

Indicates reluctant agreement or yielding to pressure, implying a lack of initial enthusiasm.

Sided with

Indicates taking a particular position in a debate or conflict, highlighting alignment with one side.

Affirmed

Emphasizes a strong declaration or confirmation, adding a sense of conviction.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use the word "concur"?

The verb "concur" is typically followed by the prepositions "with" or "in", not "to". For general agreement, use "concur with." For agreement on a specific item, use "concur in."

What can I say instead of "concurred to"?

You can use alternatives like "agreed with", "consented to", or "concurred in" depending on the context.

Is "concurred to" grammatically correct?

No, "concurred to" is not grammatically correct. The correct forms are "concurred with" or "concurred in."

How does "concurred with" differ from "agreed with"?

"Concurred with" and "agreed with" are similar, but "concurred with" often implies a more formal or official agreement. "Agreed with" is generally more casual.