concurred on that

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "concurred on that" is not entirely correct in standard written English.
It can be used when expressing agreement with a specific point or statement, but it is more common to say "concurred with that" or "concurred on this matter." Example: "After reviewing the proposal, we all concurred on that and decided to move forward."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"Everybody concurred on that one.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Heart-valve disease is progressive and takes years to develop fully, he says, and even Judge Bartle concurs on that point.

Forbes

Interview outcomes showed practitioners concurred on the design aspects that encourage the use of the area while the school staff had no strong views on the aesthetic value.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Personalized omics profiling also concurred on the fact that RNA-editing is extensively carried out in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with more than 2300 target sites and approximately 50% of them were not typical ADAR or APOBEC edits [ 15].

BMC Cancer

He said that the Special Purpose Team officer concurred that "on-the-spot" use of LSD in field questioning "would have broadened greatly this valuable intelligence breakthrough, and on a most secure basis, since the subjects were too simple, too ignorant, to have any idea what was going on".

The New Yorker

Last week, Mr. Schwarzenegger and the four legislative leaders concurred on a series of bills that included $15.1 billion in budget cuts, $14.4 billion in tax increases and $11.4 billion in borrowing, much of it subject to voter approval.

The New York Times

So in filing separate lawsuits, the two groups seemed to be suggesting that while they concurred on the lead-paint issue, no one had crossed the ideological divide for good.

The New York Times

Dr. Lurie concurred on Friday, telling the conference that poison was in his opinion the most likely immediate cause of Lenin's death.

The New York Times - Health

The OBR concurred on the latter point but noted that corporation tax receipts were likely to fall "considerably short" of its March forecast, and growth in VAT and excise duties so far this year was also much weaker than expected.

The Guardian - Business

The two concurred on almost every point.

Huffington Post

But in testimony to the House International Relations Committee, Mr. Kean said that "as I've read it in the newspapers, I think Senator Roberts's proposal is a constructive alternative" and "the one thing we do concur on absolutely is that the present situation is unacceptable and has to be changed".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the context: "agreed" might suit informal settings, while "concurred" could be more appropriate in formal or professional communication. Do not overuse "concurred on that" unless it is the most appropriate choice.

Common error

Avoid using "concurred on that" as it is often perceived as grammatically incorrect. The more accepted phrasing is "concurred with that". Pay attention to the preposition following "concurred" to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "concurred on that" serves to indicate agreement or alignment regarding a specific point or issue. However, Ludwig AI signals that it is not entirely correct in standard written English. It implies that multiple parties have reached a consensus.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

45%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "concurred on that" is used to indicate agreement, but it is considered grammatically questionable. While it appears across diverse sources, including news, science, and business, the preferred phrasing is either "concurred with that" or "agreed on that". Ludwig AI marks it as not entirely correct. Despite its common usage, particularly in News & Media and Science contexts, writers should lean towards the alternatives to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. Top authoritative sources that employ this term include The New York Times and The Guardian, which highlights its presence in reputable publications even if more precise alternatives exist.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreed with that

Replaces "concurred" with the more common "agreed", indicating a simpler form of agreement.

saw eye to eye on that

Uses an idiomatic expression to convey complete agreement or alignment on a particular issue.

were in agreement on that

Emphasizes the state of being in agreement, adding a slightly more formal tone.

were of one mind on that

Highlights the unity of thought, which is less common.

shared that opinion

Focuses on sharing the same viewpoint or belief, highlighting the similarity in thought.

were unanimous on that

Emphasizes complete agreement among all parties involved. It's a more assertive version.

supported that view

Indicates active support for a particular perspective or stance.

endorsed that position

Suggests a formal approval or backing of a specific standpoint or policy.

confirmed that

Indicates that something was verified to be true, shifting the focus to validation.

acknowledged that point

Highlights the recognition of a specific detail or argument, rather than outright agreement.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "concurred on that"?

While some instances of "concurred on that" exist, it is generally considered less grammatically sound than alternatives like "concurred with that" or "agreed on that".

What does "concurred on that" mean?

The phrase means that there was an agreement on a specific matter or point. However, it's more common and grammatically preferred to say "agreed on that" or "concurred with that".

Can I use "concurred on that" in formal writing?

In formal writing, it's best to use "concurred with that" or another more standard phrase to ensure clarity and correctness. While "concurred on that" isn't strictly wrong, it is less common and might be perceived as less polished.

What are some alternatives to "concurred on that"?

Alternatives include "agreed on that", "concurred with that", "were in agreement on that", or "shared that opinion", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.