concurred it was essential

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "concurred it was essential" is not correct in standard written English.
It lacks a subject and a conjunction, making it unclear and incomplete. Example: "The committee concurred that it was essential to implement the new policy for better efficiency."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

His nine year old son concurred: "It's cool, it's so massive".

Independent

McInnes concurs: "It was strange, but it was also potent.

The Guardian

Moreover, Australian pharmacists (91% of 484 respondents) also concurred that it is essential for them to possess knowledge on both conventional and complementary medicines [ 14].

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Follow Lisa Divenuta on Twitter.

Vice

SJ: It was essential.

Independent

Now it was essential.

The New York Times - Books

It was essential.

The New Yorker

It was essential to dig.

The New York Times

"It was essential," she says.

Independent

"But it was essential.

The New York Times - Arts

His advice was critical: it was essential".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure your sentences include a clear subject and conjunction when expressing agreement. For example: "The committee concurred that it was essential to implement the new policy for better efficiency."

Common error

Don't omit necessary sentence elements such as subjects and conjunctions. Omitting these can lead to unclear or grammatically incorrect statements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase, as it stands, lacks a clear grammatical function due to the absence of a subject and conjunction. In corrected forms, it functions as a clause expressing agreement on the necessity of something. Ludwig AI highlights that the phrase is grammatically incorrect in its current form.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "concurred it was essential" is grammatically incorrect as it lacks a subject and a conjunction. As Ludwig AI points out, it requires restructuring for clarity and correctness. Although the individual words suggest a formal register, the phrase's incorrect grammar makes it unsuitable for professional or academic use. Alternatives such as "agreed it was necessary" or "acknowledged it was crucial" provide grammatically sound ways to express a similar meaning. It's essential to include a subject and conjunction (e.g., "The committee concurred that it was essential") to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. Without these corrections, the phrase should be avoided in formal writing. In conclusion, always prioritize grammatical correctness to effectively communicate your intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreed it was necessary

Uses "agreed" instead of "concurred" and "necessary" instead of "essential", making it more straightforward.

agreed it was vital

Replaces "concurred" with a more common synonym "agreed" and "essential" with "vital", slightly altering the tone.

acknowledged it was crucial

Substitutes "concurred" with "acknowledged" and "essential" with "crucial", emphasizing importance.

confirmed its importance

Uses "confirmed" instead of "concurred" and focuses on the importance of something.

affirmed its necessity

Replaces the entire clause with a more concise expression focusing on affirming the necessity itself.

endorsed its significance

Replaces "concurred" with "endorsed" and "essential" with "significance", highlighting approval and value.

recognized its critical role

Focuses on acknowledging the importance of the subject by pinpointing its critical role.

supported the need for it

Expresses agreement by supporting the need, which indirectly implies it being essential.

backed its imperative nature

Highlights the urgent and unavoidable nature of something, using more formal language.

validated its indispensable nature

Emphasizes that something is indispensable by validating it, which implies that it cannot be dismissed or omitted.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "concurred it was essential"?

You can use phrases like "agreed it was necessary", "acknowledged it was crucial", or "affirmed its necessity". These options provide grammatically sound and clear ways to express agreement with the importance of something. For example, instead of saying "He concurred it was essential", you might say "He "agreed it was necessary"".

How can I use "agreed it was necessary" instead of "concurred it was essential"?

Using "agreed it was necessary" involves replacing the more formal "concurred" with "agreed" and "essential" with "necessary". This makes the sentence more straightforward and easier to understand. For instance: "The team "agreed it was necessary" to revise the strategy".

Is "concurred it was essential" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "concurred it was essential" is not grammatically correct in standard written English. It lacks a subject and conjunction, making it unclear. A corrected version would include these elements, such as, "The committee concurred that it was essential."

When is it appropriate to use formal alternatives like "affirmed its necessity"?

Formal alternatives such as "affirmed its necessity" are best used in professional or academic contexts where precise and elevated language is preferred. These phrases add a level of sophistication to your writing, making it suitable for reports, presentations, or formal communications.