concur with

USAGE SUMMARY

"concur with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate agreement with another person or opinion. For example: "I concur with your assessment that the project should be delayed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some Democrats concur with this assessment.

The Economist

China's leaders concur with unpleasant zeal.

The Economist

I wholeheartedly concur with Walter Dean Myers.

The New York Times

National Geographic appears to concur with the president.

Independent

(We concur with what the men have said).

The Guardian

We concur with this most conservative sounding of imperatives.

The Guardian - Books

"I have to concur with Mr. Robertson," he said.

The New Yorker

Actually, much research and many experts concur with both points.

The New York Times

"We certainly concur with the depth of the problem.

The New York Times

Most serious analysts concur with this three-piece approach.

The New York Times

But several comic-book historians concur with Mr. Robinson's account.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing for international audience, try to substitute "concur with" with "agree with", since it's easier for non-native speakers.

Common error

Avoid using "concur with" in casual conversations. It can sound overly formal or pretentious in everyday settings; simpler alternatives like "agree" are preferable.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "concur with" is to express agreement or alignment with a statement, opinion, or decision. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is frequently used across varied contexts to denote shared perspectives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

29%

News & Media

26%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "concur with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to express formal agreement. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is prevalent across various contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings, lending itself well to professional and academic discussions. While "concur with" is appropriate for formal contexts, simpler alternatives like "agree with" are suitable for casual conversations. Remember to use "concur with" when you want to convey a sense of educated agreement, and avoid it in informal settings where it might sound pretentious.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agree with

This is the simplest and most direct synonym, lacking the formality of "concur".

be in agreement with

This phrase adds a slightly more formal tone while maintaining the core meaning of agreement.

see eye to eye with

This idiom implies a complete agreement and shared perspective.

be of the same opinion as

This phrase highlights a shared viewpoint or belief.

be of one mind with

Similar to 'see eye to eye', this indicates a complete consensus.

subscribe to the same view as

This phrase is more formal and suggests intellectual agreement.

be in accordance with

Implies that the idea is consistent with the guidelines of someone or something else.

assent to

This is a more formal synonym suggesting approval or agreement, often in an official context.

endorse

This verb implies active support or approval, going beyond simple agreement.

accede to

Implies reluctantly giving in.

FAQs

What does "concur with" mean?

"Concur with" means to agree with someone or something, especially in a formal or official context. It indicates that you share the same opinion or belief.

When is it appropriate to use "concur with"?

It's appropriate to use "concur with" in formal writing, professional settings, or academic discussions where a more sophisticated tone is desired. In casual conversation, simpler terms like "agree" are often better.

What can I say instead of "concur with"?

You can use alternatives like "agree with", "be in agreement with", or "see eye to eye with" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "I am concur with"?

No, "I am concur with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is "I concur with". "Concur" is a verb and doesn't require the auxiliary verb "am".