Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
A concrete quantity of 54000 cuyd was placed on the dam.
More specifically, could properties that adhere to a concrete quantity facilitate the processing of these multi-representational numerals to some extent?
As a result, the facilitation of concrete quantity representation in multi-representational numerals might be observed behaviorally when amplified by the lack of global attentional resources.
Second, multi-representational numerals might allow for subitizing, which means a small number of concrete quantity, such as 1 4 dots, can be processed more rapidly, accurately, and confidently than a larger number of concrete quantity, such as 6 9 dots, which requires effortful counting.
As a concrete quantity, the Roman and Chinese numerals for one, two and three could potentially evoke subitizing processing as several separate lines and thus facilitate the access of magnitude information in these numerals.
Similar(54)
The parametric study showed a good correlation for the cost, the number of strands and the steel and concrete quantities with the span length.
Structural BIM model generates steel and concrete quantities; MEP BIM model generates pipe sizes and quantities.
When calculating concrete quantities for a slab placement, 62% of practitioners preferred using 2D drawings compared 38% preferring a 3D computer model and 0% for a physical model.
Being concrete quantities already, these numerals could directly provide magnitude information in the analogical number line and thus facilitate the magnitude judgment.
One possible interpretation of these differences is that small Chinese numerals evoked subitizing processing as small concrete quantities when lacking attentional resources.
Similar prediction could also be drawn from notation-dependent theories [4], [5], [7], such that multi-representational numerals, as concrete quantities, can directly access magnitude information embedded in their particular internal representations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com