conclusions of science

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conclusions of science" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the results or findings derived from scientific research or inquiry. Example: "The conclusions of science often challenge our preconceived notions and encourage further exploration of the natural world."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

And that is why my book intersperses real world examples with the latest conclusions of science.

The Guardian - Books

Rather, publicly acceptable standards are those that rely on common sense, on facts generally known, and on the conclusions of science that are well established and not controversial.

SEP

It was as if it didn't really matter whether the conclusions of science were incompatible with a literal Biblical account of things (Larson 1997).

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Instead he suggests citizens must rely on "plain truths now widely accepted, or available, to citizens generally," which include the conclusions of science when not controversial (Rawls 1996, 224 225).

SEP

Admittedly, the conclusions of science can be inconvenient.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The more people believed in free-market ideology, the less they believed in climate science; the more they accepted science in general, the more they accepted the conclusions of climate science; and the more likely they were to be conspiracy theorists, the less likely they were to believe in climate science.

The New Yorker

Secondly the conclusions of the science are negative rather than positive.

The Economist

Where does the result lie on the continuum from preliminary studies, designed to suggest further directions of research, to maximally supported conclusions of the science?

The New York Times

Furthermore, remember that numerous independent inquiries in the UK and US into the first batch of climate emails found without reservation that the compelling conclusions of climate science stood unchanged.

The Guardian

A new paper by scholars Troy Campbell and Aaron Kay confirmed what several previous studies have hinted at: Republican aversion to the conclusions of climate science diminishes when presented with responses that fit more closely with their values (policies that don't challenge the logic of the free market, for example).

The Guardian

"While accepting the conclusions of climate science, Exxon and Chevron stress the importance of energy security and affordability over reducing emissions".

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "conclusions of science", ensure that the context clearly indicates which scientific field or study the conclusions are derived from. This adds clarity and strengthens the credibility of the statement.

Common error

Avoid presenting "the conclusions of science" as a monolithic entity. Different scientific fields and studies may have varying or even contradictory conclusions. Always specify the area of science or specific studies being referenced to prevent misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conclusions of science" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It denotes findings or results obtained through scientific investigation. As Ludwig AI signals, this term is grammatically sound and is employed to introduce or summarize scientific results.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "conclusions of science" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in English used to refer to the findings or results derived from scientific inquiry. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is suitable for formal contexts and typically appears in scientific, academic, and journalistic settings. Alternatives include "scientific findings" or "results of scientific inquiry". When using this phrase, it's crucial to specify the scientific field or study to avoid overgeneralization and maintain clarity. While deemed grammatically correct, this phrase is less common than its alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

scientific findings

This alternative replaces "conclusions of science" with a more direct term for the results obtained through scientific research.

results of scientific inquiry

This option expands on the original phrase by specifying the process through which the conclusions are derived.

scientific results

This is a more concise way of expressing the outcomes of scientific studies.

findings of scientific studies

This alternative emphasizes the research context from which the conclusions are drawn.

outcomes of scientific research

This choice uses "outcomes" as a synonym for conclusions, highlighting the results of research efforts.

scientific deductions

This term implies a more logical and reasoned approach to arriving at the scientific result.

scientific inferences

This highlights conclusions drawn from evidence and reasoning, rather than direct observation.

research findings

A more general term that omits the word 'scientific' but clearly refers to results from research.

discoveries in science

Focuses on the novel aspects of the findings, emphasizing new knowledge gained.

scientific consensus

Emphasizes the agreement among scientists regarding a particular conclusion.

FAQs

How can I use "conclusions of science" in a sentence?

You can use "conclusions of science" to refer to findings or results derived from scientific research. For example, "The conclusions of science suggest that climate change is largely driven by human activity."

What phrases are similar to "conclusions of science"?

Alternatives include "scientific findings", "results of scientific inquiry", or "scientific results".

Is it appropriate to use "conclusions of science" in formal writing?

Yes, "conclusions of science" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in academic, scientific, or journalistic contexts where scientific results are being discussed.

What is the difference between "conclusions of science" and "scientific theories"?

"Conclusions of science" typically refer to specific findings from research, whereas "scientific theories" are broader explanations of natural phenomena that are supported by a large body of evidence. Theories provide a framework for understanding, while conclusions are more specific results.