From the simulation results shown in Figure 8, we have the following conclusions: Figure 8 Performance evaluation under different CAR.
From the simulation results illustrated in Figure 9, we have the following conclusions: Figure 9 Connection-level QoS provision under different DAR: (a) PDR versus DAR; (b) PDR variance versus DAR; (c) QoS outage rate versus DAR; (d) system throughput versus DAR.
Note that parsimony trees lead to the same conclusions (Figure S4) "Whole-gene" and NACHT phylogenetic trees were also constructed with the same genes.
There was no correlation between IL-5 responses to PHA and IL-5 responses to any of the mycobacterial antigens tested, although the numbers available to for analysis were too small in this group to draw any meaningful conclusions (Figure 4).
A more elegant way to address this question uses multivariate genetic analysis, which comes to the same conclusion (Figures 1 and 2).
In conclusion, Figures 2a and b show that GS cannot compete with traditional selection when the number of phenotypic records is limited, unless the generation interval can be decreased by GS.
The conclusion figure out the correct size as well as the most optimal airfoil shapes for small-size wind turbines suitable for low wind speed conditions.
Rarefaction analysis also showed that slope of curve was steeper for the Cryptomeria community, which supported above conclusion (Figure 1).
However, recalling that FIR filters require a large order (window size N≫1) to guarantee good performance, we obtain the following conclusion: Figure 4 Effect of the estimator window size N on the error difference between OUFIR and OFIR estimators.
