"conclusion statement" is a correct and usable term in written English.
It is typically used to refer to the final part of a written piece where the author sums up and restates their main points or argument. Example: In conclusion, the evidence presented clearly supports the theory that climate change is caused by human activity.
Systematic reviews critically appraise and synthesize the best available evidence to provide a conclusion statement (a "take-home point") in response to a specific answerable clinical question.
Of particular concern in this regard is the high level conclusion statement on page ES-6 that "We did not find evidence that these mechanisms have led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States".
Main conclusion: Statement about the main outcome of the research.
This conclusion statement is not substantiated because their simulation data are about a particular statistical method (namely the DeLong et al. method [ 3]) being used in a particular way (actually a misuse as we will show in this paper), but their conclusion is about the general AUC metric.
Every annotated GATMD experimental record also includes a summary statement based on the experiment and the results obtained and, in addition, an overall conclusion statement was included for every paper annotated in GATMD summarizing the totality of the study findings (Table 1).
Research studies were analyzed and evidence summaries and conclusion statements written and graded for strength of research design.
That such a large number of relevant articles were discovered in spite of this indicates that there may be many more articles in other or earlier journals that support the efficacy and effectiveness of EM, further strengthening the ten conclusion statements above.
Pollack describes the exposures and the study results, and quotes the conclusions statement given above, emphasizing the comparison between the Moscow embassy staff and staff of other Eastern European embassies.
Sayre's argument aims at the conclusion "No statement can be treated as either true or false".
"We think companies should dream up their own products rather than willfully copying ours, and in August a jury in California reached the same conclusion," the statement said.
In conclusion, the statement A ˜ = ( a ˜ n k ) ∈ ( c : ℓ p ) is obtained following Lemma 6.2.
