Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
However, this conclusion is incorrect.
The chief worry is that Strawson's point that no one is remotely inclined to accept the sceptic's claim that there is no knowledge establishes at most that we regard such arguments as having the status of defending a paradoxical conclusion, which in itself does not explain why the conclusion is incorrect.
Additionally, some authors drew the conclusion that the flow rate is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the channel for large K, and the flow rate is quadratic as K 2 in the leading-order behavior for small K[16] [18]; it is noteworthy that this conclusion is incorrect.
Our analysis shows that this conclusion is incorrect.
Second, their conclusion is incorrect due to several logical flaws already apparent in the abstract.
Other studies suggest that this conclusion is incorrect, arguing that it is an artifact created by errors of scale [ 10, 11], overrepresentation of some study locations [ 12], inconspicuousness or low abundance of some taxa [ 13], incomplete or inconsistent sampling methods [ 12, 14, 15], and even a latitudinal bias in incorrect taxonomy [ 16].
Similar(52)
It turns out the conclusion was incorrect.
Dr. Achtman said this conclusion was incorrect because the Krause team had omitted DNA from several human cases that place the root of the tree much further back in time.
He didn't realize that the lead containing glass absorbed all vitamin D producing solar radiation and therefore his conclusion was incorrect.
So their attentions are misguided, their conclusions are incorrect.
Now we know from the F.B.I. itself that -- even when it's their own examiners, who are the best in the world -- that at least 11percentt of the time, when you test the mitochondrial DNA, the conclusions are incorrect.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com