Exact(59)
This shows conclusion (i).
We prove conclusion (i) first.
The conclusion (i) follows from (4.2). □.
Then we have the conclusion (i) of Theorem 1.1.
It is evident that conclusion (i) implies conclusion (ii).
Thus the conclusion (i) of Theorem 2.1 holds.
Suppose that conclusion (i) of Lemma 4.4 holds.
Thus, by Theorem 4.3(i), we obtain the conclusion (i).
To prove conclusion (i), we suppose that (langle x_{1}rangle^>0).
Hence, either the conclusion (i) or the conclusion (ii) of Lemma 3.2 holds.
Similar(1)
Conclusion: Is the HKTS 20BQ worth the money?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com