conclude a murderer

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conclude a murderer" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to express a conclusion about someone being a murderer, but the wording is awkward and unclear. Example: "After reviewing all the evidence, the jury was able to conclude that he was a murderer."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

But Sokolenko was not, British detectives would conclude, a murderer.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Is she, as the tenant concludes, a mass murderer?

The New York Times - Books

Concluding a peace treaty?

The New York Times

A psychological profile developed by the F.B.I. concluded that the murderer was a loner who'd had psychological counselling and collected pornography, and who was "odd and wimpy".

The New Yorker

If the audience is looking for a murderer, it may conclude from this that this is the man they are after, misjudging an idiosyncrasy of his character.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The report, which consolidated the results of 14 other studies and examined more cases than previous analyses, concluded that murderers sentenced to death will end up costing taxpayers three times more over the length of the case than if they were sentenced to life without parole.

The Guardian

The judge concluded by reminding the jury that it was better a murderer go free than an innocent man be convicted.

Wikipedia

After watching "Making A Murderer," Hartman, a paralegal, says that she concluded that Avery was wrongfully convicted in the 2005 murder of 25-year-old Wisconsin photographer Teresa Halbach. .

Huffington Post

"Everything was happening too slowly or didn't happen at all; it took the police a week to even identify the victim and only after a few months, after the court experts have concluded that the murderers were affiliated with the building development sector, they decided to search the car that the owner of her house had been using on the date of the murder".

Vice

She concludes that most murderers are shaped by the combination of damage to the brain, particularly to the frontal lobes, which control aggression and impulsiveness, and the even more complex damage visited by repeated, violent child abuse.

The New York Times - Arts

"A murderer".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "conclude a murderer" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives such as "determine someone is a murderer" or "identify someone as a murderer".

Common error

The verb "conclude" typically requires a clause or a statement as its object, not a person. Saying "conclude a murderer" sounds awkward. Instead, clarify what you are concluding about the person, such as "conclude that someone is a murderer."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conclude a murderer" functions as an attempt to express a conclusion about an individual's status as a murderer. However, it is grammatically unsound, as the verb "conclude" typically requires a clause or statement, not a person, as its object. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is not correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "conclude a murderer" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrasing is awkward and unclear. While the available examples come from reputable sources such as The Guardian and The New York Times, they don't validate the phrase's correctness but rather highlight its infrequent and potentially incorrect usage. Better alternatives include phrases like "determine someone is a murderer" or "identify someone as a murderer". When writing, prioritize clarity and grammatical correctness to avoid miscommunication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

determine someone is a murderer

Focuses on the act of determining someone's guilt rather than reaching a conclusion.

identify someone as a murderer

Emphasizes the act of identifying or recognizing someone as a murderer.

find someone to be a murderer

Highlights the legal or investigative process of finding someone guilty.

decide that someone is a murderer

Focuses on the decision-making process regarding someone's guilt.

establish someone's guilt as a murderer

Highlights the process of proving someone's guilt in a murder case.

prove someone is a murderer

Focuses on the act of demonstrating someone's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

convict someone of murder

Refers to the legal outcome of finding someone guilty of murder.

sentence someone for murder

Emphasizes the sentencing phase after a murder conviction.

implicate someone in a murder

Highlights the act of showing someone's involvement in a murder.

label someone a murderer

Focuses on the act of assigning the label of "murderer" to someone.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically correct way to say "conclude a murderer"?

A more accurate way to phrase this would be to say "conclude that someone is a murderer" or "determine someone is a murderer". The verb "conclude" usually takes a statement or clause as its object.

Is it ever correct to use "conclude" with a person as the object?

No, it's generally incorrect to use "conclude" with a person as a direct object. You can, however, "conclude a meeting" or "conclude an agreement," where "meeting" and "agreement" are the objects, not people. To express concluding something about a person, use "conclude that" followed by a clause.

What are some alternatives to "conclude a murderer" that maintain a similar meaning?

Alternatives include "identify someone as a murderer", "find someone to be a murderer", or "decide that someone is a murderer", all of which are clearer and more grammatically sound.

How does the context affect the choice of words when describing someone as a murderer after an investigation?

The context determines the most appropriate phrase. In a legal context, "convict someone of murder" is fitting. In an investigative context, "determine someone is a murderer" or "identify someone as a murderer" might be more suitable.