The phrase "concise argument" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to a short but effective statement or argument that makes a point without going into too much detail. For example, "His concise argument was convincing and made it clear why the decision should be made in his favor."
The radio scripts that he wrote and read in the nineteen-seventies, at a rate of five a week, were models of concise argument, as were his letters to contemporaries like William F. Buckley, Jr.
Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks, who recently defeated Miami Heat to take the NBA Championship, has responded to a claim that he is unfit to be in charge with a singularly concise argument.
"Why Translation Matters" (an extended essay, really) is one of the first texts in Yale's energetic new series, Why X Matters, each volume of which is to present a "concise argument for the continuing relevance of an important person or idea".
What the judges will be looking for, particularly in the first round of the competition: Clear and concise argument based on the chosen theme Supported by factual evidence That your piece meets the theme brief A piece that "lives" to the reader.
Robert R. Wolfe, Ph.D., now director of the Center for Translational Research in Aging & Longevity at Texas A&M University, gave such a concise argument with colleague, Susan L. Miller, Ph.D., in this 2008 viewpoint piece in JAMA.
They then construct a concise argument to support their analysis.
In life, learning to write concise arguments is a crucial skill for almost any profession, but one that most people lack.
He had been praised by judges and colleagues for his clear and concise arguments, and he had been asked time and again to speak at national investor conferences.
There are also philosophically concise arguments made in Part 4 about parks and democracy, that elsewhere are not as well articulated.
The Christian Science Monitor called the book a "a concise, accessible argument against the notion that we can defeat terrorism through aid and education".
Instead, we invited Sullivan to present a more concise counter-argument, absent some of the raw emotion that fueled his initial response.
