But that concern strikes me as, well, paternalistic.
Mr. Foley's concern struck a chord with many in this disparate district, whose demographics range from the superrich in Palm Beach to transplanted New Yorkers at the Century Village retirement complex in West Palm Beach to citrus growers and cattle ranchers in the rural western reaches.
Here is a simple grounding-theoretic proposal: all the facts concerning strikes are grounded in facts that don't concern strikes.
So long as picket is grounded in facts that don't concern strikes, this proposal is compatible with the grounding-strike thesis.
Hence, while picket and strike may be grounded in facts that don't concern strikes, there is a fact concerning strikes ground that isn't grounded in facts that don't concern strikes, because it's not grounded in any facts at all.
So long as picket and the various essential truths involved in the proposal essence, essence*, and so on are all grounded in facts that don't concern strikes, the proposal is compatible with the grounding-strike thesis.
One worry for this proposal, however, is this: while picket is presumably grounded in facts that don't concern strikes, it's unclear what if anything grounds facts like essence (see §5).
It then lists off the relevant "concerns": "strike activity is low, wages are responsive to economic downturns and there are multiple forms of employment arrangements that offer employees and employers flexible options for working".
Now, it may be that there are church-state issues (in terms of the separation between advertising and editorial) that prevent a paper like the Times from using big names (the kind of names the paper is likely to write about) to sell itself, although such concerns strike me as not very sensible.
The organization of, and clashes between, many character-spaces within a single narrative totality is essential to the novel's very achievement and concerns, striking at issues central to narrative poetics, the aesthetics of realism, and the dynamics of literary representation.
Indeed, the larger question of how criminal justice is different when the presidency is concerned struck both the professors and their students as tough to answer.
