conceptual validity

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conceptual validity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, psychology, or philosophy when discussing the extent to which a concept accurately represents the phenomenon it is intended to measure or describe. Example: "The study's findings were evaluated for their conceptual validity to ensure that the theoretical framework accurately reflected the observed behaviors."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

Next, we turn to conceptual validity.

Harvard Business Review

I conclude that BE elimination undermined rather than increased conceptual validity and usefulness for treatment research.

Clinical Psychology Review

This volume collects essays from international experts who evaluate the robustness, conceptual validity, and reliability of the growing body of evidence.

Harvard University

Finally, let's look at the practical value of the ideas presented in these books—which, of course, depends on but isn't entirely determined by their empirical and conceptual validity.

Harvard Business Review

The approach proves that all kinds of "absolute" potential are implicit in the thermodynamics of the cell and all have the same conceptual validity.

Electrochimica Acta

Subsequently, the computational experiments conducted substantiate the conceptual validity of the proposed facility layout formulation for RCPSP and the comprehensive simulation shows the effectiveness of the PABC algorithm for RCPSP.

Computers & Operations Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Their tools, which are subject to easy manipulation, are lacking in validity and conceptual rigor.

HuffPost

Conceptual content validity: The authors note that the current literature is lacking on evidence on importance of concepts related to "treatment satisfaction", "adherence" and "impact of flares" and are thus "future considerations".

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

For PRO endpoint data to be accepted as evidence of treatment effectiveness, there must be evidence documenting the instrument's conceptual framework, content validity, and psychometric qualities, including reliability, validity and responsiveness.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF) and LupusQoL demonstrated the strongest face validity, conceptual coverage and psychometric properties measuring key concepts in the conceptual model.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Stineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R, Granger CV, Maislin G. Functional Independence Staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research or theoretical frameworks, clearly define how "conceptual validity" was assessed (e.g., expert review, statistical analysis) to strengthen your argument and enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "conceptual validity" interchangeably with other types of validity like 'criterion validity' or 'construct validity'. Each term has a specific meaning, and misuse can weaken your argument's precision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conceptual validity" functions as a noun phrase, where "conceptual" modifies "validity". It describes the degree to which a concept accurately represents the idea it is intended to represent. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

65%

Academia

20%

News & Media

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "conceptual validity" is a phrase used to describe the degree to which a concept accurately represents the idea it's intended to represent. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used in various contexts, especially in science and academic writing. The phrase's register is formal and scientific. When discussing research or theoretical frameworks, ensure you clearly define how "conceptual validity" was assessed. Alternatives such as "theoretical validity" and "construct validity" can be used depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

theoretical validity

Focuses more on the alignment with established theories.

construct validity

Emphasizes the degree to which a test or measure assesses the intended construct.

conceptual accuracy

Highlights the correctness and precision of a concept.

conceptual soundness

Stresses the robustness and logical consistency of a concept.

theoretical soundness

Focuses on the robustness and logical consistency of a theory.

conceptual relevance

Emphasizes the pertinence and applicability of a concept to a specific context.

logical validity

Highlights the adherence to logical principles and reasoning.

content validity

Focuses on how well a measure represents all facets of a given construct.

conceptual basis

Refers to the foundational understanding or rationale behind a concept.

face validity

Refers to how well a measure appears to assess what it is supposed to.

FAQs

How is "conceptual validity" assessed in research?

"Conceptual validity" is often assessed through expert reviews, literature reviews, and logical argumentation to ensure the concept accurately represents the intended phenomenon. It can also be supported by demonstrating "construct validity".

What's the difference between "conceptual validity" and "construct validity"?

"Conceptual validity" focuses on whether a concept makes sense and accurately represents an idea. "Construct validity", on the other hand, tests whether a measurement tool truly measures the concept it claims to measure.

When is "conceptual validity" most important?

"Conceptual validity" is most critical when developing new theories, models, or measures. It ensures that the foundational ideas are well-defined and logically sound before empirical testing.

What happens if a concept lacks "conceptual validity"?

If a concept lacks "conceptual validity", any research or applications based on that concept may be flawed. This can lead to inaccurate conclusions, ineffective strategies, and a misrepresentation of the phenomenon being studied. It's important to ensure "conceptual soundness".