Sentence examples for conceptual comparison of from inspiring English sources

A chart just below indicates a kind of conceptual comparison of iterative and coiterative ideas.

The paper focuses on a conceptual comparison of the different policies which will allow their evaluation independently of these implementation details.

This first in-depth empirical and conceptual comparison of fMRI EC and TMS chronometry thereby shows the complementary insights offered by the two methods.

The lines in at the bottom of the conceptual comparison chart are the most programmatic of all.

In addition, it is (nearly) the dual concept of a congruence on an algebra; this explains our line in the conceptual comparison chart.

Our conceptual comparison makes the point that algebras embody sets with operations.

We provide some conceptual and numerical comparison of the various cost contributions to each random field simulation method.

In this paper we therefore present a conceptual and experimental comparison of backbone extraction techniques in a transport-geographical context, and explore the new insights each technique can offer to enhance our understanding of the Southeast Asian intercity air transport network (SAAN).

The Challenge Problems were computationally simple models that were intended as vehicles for the illustration and comparison of conceptual and numerical techniques for use in analyses that involve: (i) epistemic uncertainty, (ii) aggregation of multiple characterizations of epistemic uncertainty, (iii) combination of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty, and (iv) models with repeated parameters.

This approach allowed a more meaningful comparison of conceptual approaches to listing among states as it removed distinctions among listing priorities (endangered versus threatened versus special concern) that are often rooted in policy and politics [15].

Validity evidence was also obtained from short written responses, comparison of the conceptual framework and authentic writing theory, and correlations between scores on the PAW Scale and (1) writing self-efficacy (r = .097, ns), (2) writing interest (r = .542, p < .001), (3) mastery goal orientation (r = .446, p < .05), and self-reported prior achievement in writing (r = .116, ns).