Exact(5)
Group differences of endocannabinoid concentrations were tested using the Wilcoxon-Test.
Due to non-gaussian data distribution as determined by the Shapiro-Wilk's W test, group differences of endocannabinoid concentrations were tested using the Wilcoxon-Test.
Two TiO2 concentrations were tested using the wet application method (10 and 20 mg/kg dm, about 50% increase in reproduction for dry spiking and 32% increase in reproduction for wet spiking of food compared to control).
Associations between individual fish length/weight and tissue metal concentrations were tested using regression analysis.
Samples were sent to an independent laboratory, and concentrations were tested using aqueous injection HPLC with postcolumn derivatization (Georgia Chemical Laboratory, Athens, GA, USA).
Similar(55)
The ability of Group II C. botulinum strains to grow at refrigeration temperatures or in media containing different NaCl concentrations was tested using vials of PYGS medium inoculated with spores of appropriate strains.
The endonuclease activity and the concentration were tested using a plasmid nicking assay as follows: 200 ng of circular plasmid were incubated with 10 μl of CJE dilution in 1 × CELI Buffer (10 mM MgSO4, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM KCl, 0.02% Triton X-100, 0.002% bovine serum albumin) in 20 μl final volume.
The QFT control of the dissolved oxygen concentration was tested using an experimentally pilot plant that is also presented in the paper.
In each independent experiment, each concentration was tested using four replicates; five decapitated animals per replicate were put in 20 mL of solution.
Percentage of fluoride desorbed as a function of NaOH concentration was tested using synthetic fluoride solution [( F^ )]0 = 10 mg/L, for optimum conditions (dose of iron ore = 5 g/L, particle size of iron ore <0.075 mm, agitation rate = 150 rpm and contact time = 120 min).
The required NaCl concentration was tested using an electrical conductance (EC) meter and was applied at an initial rate of 3 dS m-1 from day 9 post-emergence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com