Exact(1)
For example, patients with mild symptoms of spasm severity may still have enormous embarrassment (items 18-22) or feel difficult in concentration (item 26).
Similar(59)
The CIS is a self-administered questionnaire assessing 20 items, concerning 4 subscales divided in: subjective experienced fatigue (8 items), concentration (5 items), motivation (4 items) and physical activity (3 items).
The factors were thematically conceptualised to reflect 'Lack of energy' (15 items), 'Weakness' (9 items), 'Effects of Heat' (4 items), 'Concentration' (4 items) and 'Rest' (4 items).
It has four subscales: fatigue severity (8 items), concentration (5 items), motivation (4 items) and physical activity level (3 items).
Item 17 addresses general satisfaction with one's concentration and item 25 relates cognitive difficulties to the severity of the tinnitus.
The box-plot graphs in Figure 2 show that the association between "satisfaction with concentration" (APSA item 17) and APS20 is quite close.
The CIS20r is a multidimensional questionnaire that consists of 20 items, divided into 4 dimensions of fatigue and related behavioural aspects: (a) the subjective experience of fatigue (8 items), (b) reduction in motivation (4 items), (c) reduction of physical activity (3 items), and (d) reduction in concentration (5 items).
Arsenic intake was calculated by multiplying the average arsenic concentration in each item by the quantity of each item.
Spreading concentration for an item α which rarely spreads through friendship links (a) and item β which often spreads through friendship links (b).
This can be interpreted as a consequence of concentration of the item locations to almost the same range, which also can be seen in Figure 1, 2, 3.
Split-half reliability was assessed as the Spearman-Brown coefficient for the first 5 items (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache) and the last 5 items (concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com