Exact(28)
When cyanobacterial growth was monitored in pure culture, the cell concentration determined by real-time PCR positively correlated with the cell concentration determined from direct microscopic count.
Background doping concentration determined from capacitance voltage (C V) measurements was 1.64 × 1016 and 2.21 × 1016 cm−3 for (100) and (311)B samples, respectively.
Percentage of recovery = [CE/CM × 100], where CE is the experimental concentration determined from the calibration curve and CM is the spiked concentration.
All four binary Flory–Huggins interaction parameters were correlated as a function of concentration, determined from binary polymer solvent sorption measurements and from solvent solvent equilibrium data.
Based on Pd atom concentration determined from STEM images, the contribution of various mechanisms to the excess hydrogen uptake measured experimentally was evaluated.
The mean percent recoveries for the various metals were calculated using the following equation: {text{ Percent recovery}} = ({text{CE}}/{text {CM}}) times 100 where CE is the experimental concentration determined from the calibration curve, and CM is the spiked concentration.
Similar(32)
The LC50 values were calculated from time-related sub-lethal and lethal blood concentrations determined from human acute poisoning cases.
Donor concentrations determined from the slopes of the Mott Schottky plots show that the surface layer is depleted to sodium.
Additional Cu2+ concentrations were calculated with the ligand data and the dissolved copper concentrations determined from ambient (pier) samples.
Repetitions of the experiment showed this as a general trend, with manual integration yielding 2 3 times higher errors than FMLR deconvolution for metabolite concentrations determined from the average of all peaks from the compound.
It has been suggested that uptake (and effects) of chemicals in soils and sediments can be predicted based on estimates of pore water concentrations, determined from Kd values from batch sorption studies and BCF values predicted using QSARs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com