Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
How could (we) humans conceive these things better?
Similar(59)
We would not dare to conceive the things which are really mere commonplaces of existence.
The alternative is to conceive the thing as a collection of qualities, yet what is the nature of the ontological tie that binds them into the unity of the thing?
Existence, nonexistence, both, and neither are the only possible ways of conceiving of the status of a thing, so once each of these possible ways are eliminated, there is no way to conceive of things anymore.
Oh, I know they originally conceived the thing as a military tool or whatever, but that was merely a failure of imagination.
Why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart?
Politicians have to talk about single electoral cycles; journalists and commentators too often seem unable to conceive of things in any other terms.
It's easy to conceive of things.
In fact, they do not conceive of things at all.
They do not conceive of things as existent, nonexistent, both, or neither.
A program… can't conceive of things that it hasn't witnessed before.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com