Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Immediately after each interview, the participants' with dementia ability to use their own telephone, cell phone or computer was assessed using the observation-based Management of Everyday Technology Assessment, META [ 21].
Similar(59)
Sedentary behaviors (watching TV and using the computer) were assessed by self-report.
School year group, gender, ethnicity (white vs. other), who the participant lives with (both parents, parent and new partner, single parent, other), and the four items that comprise the Family Affluence Scale [ 26], i.e. family own a car; young adolescent has their own room; been on holiday in the last year; family own a computer, were assessed.
Ability to use computers was assessed with the following item: How comfortable do you feel using computers, in general?" measured on a 6 point scale from "very comfortable" (6), "somewhat comfortable" (5), "neither comfortable nor uncomfortable" (4), "somewhat uncomfortable" (3), "very uncomfortable" (2) and "I have never used a computer" (1).
In addition, computer familiarity and attitude toward computers were assessed through three separate items that were used in previous deployments of the CITAT.
In this section the performance of the proposed joint AML estimator is assessed via computer simulations.
The performance of the proposed joint AML estimator is assessed via computer simulations and compared with that achieved by the joint AML estimator designed for AWGN channel and that achieved by a previously derived joint estimator for OFDM systems.
Donated used computer equipment was assessed at 50% of the market cost of equivalent new equipment.
Exposure to computer work was assessed at baseline with several questions.
Acceptability of touch screen computer use was assessed using six questions answered on a five point Likert scale from 'Strongly agree' to 'Strongly disagree'.
The reliability of the computer program was assessed by comparing the results obtained with the program to a manual search conducted by two independent research assistants blinded to the results of the computer program.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com