Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
Two versions of the computer test were used: a difficult stress version with not enough time to solve the assignments and an easier control version with enough time to solve the assignments.
Similar(59)
The WCA – dubbed by one MP as a "crude computer test" – is notorious for delivering seemingly incomprehensible decisions.
A computer test was developed to determine rewarding value, i.e. 'liking' and 'wanting', for 72 items divided in six categories (bread, filling, drinks, dessert, sweets, stationery).
This computer test was an updated version of the test used by Rutters et al. [9] and Born et al. [24] and had a duration of 20 min. Subjects were given the computer test before consumption of the test meal.
The practice effects might be expected to be of a larger magnitude (despite repeated practice) due to the abbreviated quarter of the items available in the computer test being repeated at each session providing multiple exposure to a small subset of the items.
Dr Adrian Owen, one of the researchers from the Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit in Cambridge, said: "Brain training, or the quest to improve brain function through regular use of computer tests, is a multimillion-pound industry, yet up until now there's been a real lack of robust evidence to show it really works.
Computer tests are conducted on a four-generator test system.
Although minor adaptations of the computer-based test were expected, construct equivalence should nevertheless be ascertained with the aid of a detailed curricula analysis.
Still, the more traps users build into the tasks, the better they can ensure the quantum computer they test is computing accurately.
The assignment of test takers to the computer-based test is clearly non-random as it depends on having previous experience with computers as well as on successful performance on an ICT test (previous to the assessment).
Which empirical results of the computer-based test are assessable?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com