Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
The malpractice model, according to Gotterbarn, entices computer practitioners to distance themselves from accountability and blame.
In particular, the complexities that computer technologies introduce allow computer practitioners to side-step responsibility.
Computer practitioners, according to Gotterbarn, have conventionally adopted a malpractice model of responsibility that focuses on determining the appropriate person to blame for harmful incidents.
According to Gotterbarn, computer practitioners have a moral responsibility to consider such contingencies, even though they may not be legally required to do so.
Computer practitioners have a moral responsibility to avoid harm and to deliver a properly working product, according to him, regardless of whether they will be held accountable if things turn out differently.
Gotterbarn argues that the computing professions should adopt a positive concept of responsibility, as it emphasizes the obligations and duties of computer practitioners to have regard for the consequences of one's actions and to minimize the possibility of causing harm.
Similar(52)
However, many video engineers, computer graphics practitioners, and image-processing specialists use these terms carelessly.
In order to conduct an investigation involving computer networks, practitioners need to understand network architecture, be familiar with network devices and protocols, and have the ability to interpret the various network-level logs.
Questions about walking and walking pace are included, but not scored in GPPAQ, although as scoring is done automatically by many GP computer systems, practitioners may not be directly aware of this.
The availability of detailed data describing the shape of an object offers the computer vision practitioner new ways to recognize and localize free-form objects.
Similar supplementation figures prominently in computer science, whose practitioners are quite concerned to build machines with appropriate temporal properties.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com