compromising on quality

USAGE SUMMARY

"compromising on quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It usually implies that the quality of something has been lowered in exchange for some other benefit or advantage that may have been gained. For example, "We had to make some concessions in order to get the project done on time, including compromising on quality."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

We must make these homes affordable, without compromising on quality.

The Guardian - Opinion

Italy's luxury-fashion industry has long struggled to lower costs without compromising on quality.

The New Yorker

Dr Shetty's goal is to offer as many surgeries as possible, without compromising on quality.

The Economist

The prime factor for selecting equipment is its performance capability and reliability without compromising on quality.

Measurement

Conscientious wine drinkers will be penalised, possibly making some of them switch to a less costly wine, compromising on quality.

The Guardian

"We are not compromising on quality, even if that means it takes us longer to gain traction here.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

Traditionally speaking, going wireless has meant compromising on audio quality.

The Guardian

These models are capable of handling very large vocabularies without compromising on translation quality.

Stanford University

The studio say it will allow "you to hear twice as much, without compromising on comfort, quality or style".

Independent

This paper introduces a modification to original DE that enhances the convergence rate without compromising on solution quality.

Computers & Chemical Engineering

At what point can the replacement providers only make the returns work by compromising on the quality of care?" the briefing paper asks.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing trade-offs, explicitly state what benefit is being gained by "compromising on quality". For example: "To meet the tight deadline, we risked "compromising on quality" to deliver the product on schedule."

Common error

Avoid using "compromising on quality" without clarifying the reason behind the compromise. Leaving it unsaid can imply negligence or lack of concern for standards.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "compromising on quality" functions as a gerund phrase, often used as a subject, object, or part of a prepositional phrase within a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms it's grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

27%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Reference

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "compromising on quality" is a commonly used gerund phrase that expresses a trade-off where standards are lowered to achieve another objective. Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness. It's frequently found in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts. While grammatically sound, you should carefully consider the implications of reducing standards for an alternative benefit. Be sure to clarify the justification for reducing standards to avoid negative implications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sacrificing quality

Emphasizes the act of giving up quality for another benefit.

degrading quality

Focuses on the decline or deterioration of quality.

lowering standards

Highlights the reduction of established benchmarks or expectations.

reducing the caliber

Emphasizes decreasing the level of excellence or merit.

skimping on quality

Implies being stingy or frugal in providing adequate quality.

cutting corners on quality

Suggests taking shortcuts that negatively affect quality.

cheapening the quality

Highlights the decline in quality due to cost-cutting measures.

diminishing the value

Emphasizes the reduction of perceived worth or importance.

relaxing quality control

Indicates less stringent monitoring and enforcement of standards.

eroding the integrity

Highlights the gradual loss of completeness, soundness, or reliability.

FAQs

What does "compromising on quality" mean?

It means lowering the standards or accepting a lower level of quality in something, often to achieve another goal such as cost savings or faster production.

When is it acceptable to "compromising on quality"?

It might be acceptable when the benefits of doing so, such as meeting a critical deadline or staying within budget, outweigh the drawbacks of reduced quality. However, this decision should be made carefully and transparently.

What are some alternatives to "compromising on quality"?

Alternatives include "sacrificing quality", "lowering standards", or "cutting corners on quality", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How can you avoid "compromising on quality"?

You can avoid this by carefully planning projects, allocating sufficient resources, and prioritizing quality control throughout the process.