Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
comprehensive history
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "comprehensive history" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a detailed and thorough account of past events or developments in a particular subject or area. Example: "The book provides a comprehensive history of the civil rights movement in the United States."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science & Research
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Moran, M. E. Urolithiasis-A comprehensive history.
Science & Research
But it's the only comprehensive history that's been written".
News & Media
Furthermore, Schorske made no pretense of producing a comprehensive history.
News & Media
A periodontal assessment should begin with a comprehensive history.
Science & Research
A comprehensive history of the Gulf of Mexico.
News & Media
It is the most comprehensive history of that time.
News & Media
It provides the first comprehensive history of the TWUA.
Academia
What's Cooking America (//whatscookingamerica.net/History/IceCream/Sundae.htm) offers a comprehensive history of the ice cream sundae.
News & Media
However, a comprehensive history of cold war aerial reconnaissance remains to be written.
News & Media
The museum offers a comprehensive history of American ships and shipping.
News & Media
Last year in these pages, John Leonard called this an "equable, affectionate and comprehensive history".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for precision in academic or formal writing, use "comprehensive history" to signal that the work covers all significant aspects of the topic. This assures the reader that the account is not superficial.
Common error
Avoid using "comprehensive history" when a shorter, more focused overview is sufficient. For instance, if only discussing specific aspects of an event, consider using "overview", "summary", or "analysis" instead, which are less committal and more aligned to your content.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "comprehensive history" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "comprehensive" is an adjective modifying the noun "history". Ludwig confirms its role in denoting a detailed and thorough account of past events.
Frequent in
Science
30%
News & Media
30%
Academia
25%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Wiki
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "comprehensive history" is a common and grammatically sound phrase that describes a thorough and detailed account of past events. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent appearance in academic, scientific, and news contexts. While it's a valuable phrase for signaling thoroughness, it's important to ensure its use aligns with the actual scope of the content, avoiding overemphasis when a more concise overview suffices. Alternatives include "detailed historical account" or "thorough historical analysis", depending on the desired nuance.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
detailed historical account
Replaces "comprehensive" with "detailed" and reorders the words slightly for emphasis.
exhaustive historical narrative
Substitutes "comprehensive" with "exhaustive" and "history" with "narrative", implying a more story-like representation.
thorough historical analysis
Replaces "history" with "analysis", shifting the focus to a critical examination rather than a mere recounting of events.
complete historical overview
Uses "complete" instead of "comprehensive" and "overview" to suggest a broad summary.
in-depth historical study
Emphasizes the level of detail with "in-depth" and uses "study" to indicate a more academic approach.
extensive historical survey
Offers a broader perspective than a history, implying examination of a wide range of sources and data.
full historical treatment
Emphasizes the completeness of the discussion or coverage of a historical subject.
wide-ranging historical investigation
Highlights the scope of research involved in uncovering the historical details.
systematic historical review
Stresses the organized and methodical approach to recounting history.
elaborate chronicle of events
Shifts the focus to the sequence of events, with "elaborate" suggesting a high level of detail.
FAQs
What does "comprehensive history" mean?
A "comprehensive history" is a thorough and complete account of past events, developments, or aspects of a particular subject or area, leaving no important details unexamined.
How is a "comprehensive history" different from a regular history?
While a regular history might cover key events, a "comprehensive history" aims to provide an exhaustive account, delving into nuances and details that a standard history might overlook. A "detailed historical account" is a good example.
When should I use "comprehensive history" in my writing?
Use "comprehensive history" when you want to emphasize that your account is thorough, complete, and leaves no significant aspect unexplored. It's appropriate for academic papers, detailed reports, or in-depth analyses.
What are some alternatives to "comprehensive history"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "detailed historical account", "exhaustive historical narrative", or "thorough historical analysis".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested