Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The other 16 compounds missing were not recognized as they are described as Markush structures.
When there are no interfering compounds (missing type I), the assumption is justified because the DL is determined before the GC/MS dust analysis.
These inconsistencies are represented by species as well as by reactions that belong to no organization, indicating either incomplete knowledge, compounds missing from the specified growth media or modeling errors.
When there are interfering compounds (missing types II and III), the assumption cannot be fully justified because the bounds depend on the amount of interference and therefore are random.
Similar(56)
The identification of 158 compounds missed by a naïve similarity search demonstrates the complementary chemical space sampled in a hit explosion setup.
An example of a compound missing an assignment is the experimental drug cytidine-5′-diphospho-beta-delta-xylose (CID46936568), which was only classified as a pyrimidine ribonucleoside diphosphate but not classified as a purine nucleotide sugar (Fig. 9b).
After removing compounds with missing structure information, the dataset contains 42 689 compounds, 1504 of which are classified as active.
In those reactions where one compound was missing, the known compounds were compared to each other.
We delete 327 compounds with missing or inconsistent annotations of the ion mode, as well as 254 compounds for which we do not find a PubChem identifier, and 201 compounds that are not fully connected by covalent bonds.
A k-step reaction sequence is defined as a series of reactions in which a chemical compound is known to be converted to another compound by multiple enzymatic reactions, and the corresponding (k– 1) intermediate compounds are missing.
This is critical, as several biochemical pathways for key compounds are missing enzymatic activities, and in cases where entire pathways are missing, a known transporter for a particular compound is also absent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com