Sentence structure is the composition of sentences.
You can make sentences about a composite thing, you can't ask it to look back at you.
Avempace then follows Alfarabi and divides universal parts into simple and composite: simple parts of the sentence are genus, species, specific difference, property, and accident.
Modal sentences can be either composite or divided, depending on where the modal term occurs: if it is either the subject or the predicate of the sentence, while the other term is an embedded sentence in nominalized form (in 'dictum' form, in the medieval terminology), then the sentence is a composite modal sentence.
The test results that test takers receive include a numeric composite score and four diagnostic subscores in Sentence Mastery, Vocabulary, Fluency, and Pronunciation (Pearson, [2008]).
The variation is composite: it includes the pronunciation (the accents), sentence structure, and the lexicon, where the differences are most marked [ 33].
The view that a proposition can be true without existing is quite plausible under the assumption that propositions expressed by sentences which contain proper names are composite objects which literally contain the individuals denoted by these names.
More specifically, Field's idea is that the difference between sentences like '3 is prime' and '3 is composite' is that the former (but not the latter) are part of a certain well-known "story", namely, the story of mathematics.
So on this view, the difference between sentences like '3 is prime' and '3 is composite' the reason the former are "correct" and the latter are not is that the former follow from accepted mathematical axioms.
Please rewrite this sentence to clarify your point; 'The presence of a composite dense body, characteristic of platelets, in an extra-cellular matrix (ECM) producer indicated that the ECM building cell was related to megakaryocyte.' I have read this submission.
