All involved a minor imperfection, which was either an insertion, reversal or replacement of a component action within the syntactic chain.
Features that result from the automatic feature-splitting process but make no sense were removed for example, in the turtle example, "does lay" (which, while literally true, is not a distinct component action of the original feature "does lay eggs").
Call these component actions, level-one actions.
The approach is explained with the example of the electric car CyCab, where the costs are associated to energy consumption of component actions.
Detailed examples for spins s⩽2 are given including tractor and component actions, on-shell and off-shell approaches and gauge invariances.
Suppose, in addition, that each of these level-two "actions" is itself at least in part a joint action whose component actions are severally necessary and jointly sufficient for the performance of the level-two "action" in question.
Story drifts and component actions are related subsequently to the global demand parameter by the Pushover or capacity curves that are the basis of the non-linear static procedures.
The entire syntactic chain occurs with a frequency over ten thousand times greater than could be expected by chance (based upon the relative probabilities of the component actions).
Social behaviors are a great target for automatization, as they often comprised complex component actions that require time-consuming eye scoring from video, making them very low-throughput.
It is thought (at least this seems to be the view of prominent textbooks [ 1, 2]) that behavior evolves in large part by changes in quantitative characteristics such as the intensity or frequency of a behavior, the thresholds for eliciting a particular response, or the relative timing of component actions.
