Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
Better survival rate was observed with complete revisions than for partial ones in which only one component was revised.
The femoral component was revised during the same surgery in ten patients.
The acetabular component was revised to a similar 52 mm HA-coated CSF Furlong cup secured with four cancellous screws.
The loosened component was revised to a cementless THA.
1 acetabular component was revised for infection and there was 1 radiographic acetabular failure.
At our institution, however, the patellar component was revised in all cases.
Similar(49)
However, only 11 of 103 revisions including both components were revised.
Both femoral and acetabular components were revised in 37% of all revisions (Australian Orthopaedic Association).
In total, 132 acetabular components and 41 femoral components were revised, and in 55 cases, an isolated revision of the polyethylene bearing and the modular femoral head was performed for wear.
An Australian registry analysis suggests poor implant survival among patients receiving a revision of only the acetabular RSA component, and some evidence of higher revision risks among other types of RSA revisions such as where both components are revised.
This was also true for re-revision of revised primary TKA where both the femoral and tibial components were revised (Table 4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com