Sentence examples for compliant springboard from inspiring English sources
The phrase "compliant springboard" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used in contexts where you want to describe a springboard that is flexible or adaptable to various requirements or standards.
Example: "The new design serves as a compliant springboard for innovative ideas, allowing teams to explore different solutions."
Alternatives: "flexible platform" or "adaptable launching pad."
For jumps of 1.8 m distance, jumping from a compliant springboard to another compliant springboard resulted in the lowest energy expenditure (133.5±3.6 mL O2 m−1).
We hypothesised that the energetic savings achieved when jumping from a compliant springboard in comparison to a firm springboard would be greater when jumping greater distances.
Jumping from a compliant springboard to another compliant springboard was also less energetically costly than jumping in either the firm to firm condition (p<0.001; CI = −13.7 to −5.6) or the firm to compliant condition (p<0.001; CI = −11.8 to −3.6).
Jumping from a compliant springboard to another compliant springboard (161.0±10.2 mL O2 m−1) was similar energetically to jumping from a compliant to a firm springboard (160.6±6.6 mL O2 m−1; p = 0.777; CI = −9.5 to 7.2) and also similar to jumping between firm springboards (162.3±5.7 mL O2 m−1; p = 0.490; CI = −5.5 to 11.2).
Present data cannot ascertain if the increased take-off angle is at the volition of the participant and/or the result of the near vertical movement of the compliant springboard as it returns after compression.
Considering together the range of pairwise post hoc comparisons for the 1.8 m jumps, there is considerable evidence that jumping from the compliant springboard is energetically less costly than jumping from the firm springboard.
For the 1.8 m jumps the take-off angle was greater when jumping from compliant springboards (40±1.1°) than from firm surfaces (34±1.4°).
Therefore, further analysis and discussion focusses on trying to uncover and interpret why jumps from compliant springboards are less energetically costly than from firm springboards at 1.8 m but are not less energetically costly at 1.2 m.
In the present study we measured the energy cost of horizontal jumping in participants to and from both firm and compliant springboards, and for relatively short (1.2 m) and relatively long (1.8 m) jumps.
The energy expenditure jumping from a compliant to a firm springboard was also similar to the energy expenditure for jumping between firm springboards (p = 0.644; CI = −9.1 to 5.7).
A simple model of standing dives is used to investigate optimal jumping strategies from compliant surfaces and applied to springboard diving.
