We provide a quantitative criterion based on hydrophobicity and sequence complexity assessment to distinguish simple from complex TMs.
In this case, students who were coordinating composite units in activity included both aTNS and ENS students, and so the added level of complexity helped to distinguish those with more efficient unit structures (ENS students) from those who had less efficient unit structures and so were more likely to conflate the various types of composites.
However, due to an integrated view of cognition and ACT-R's complexity, it is difficult to distinguish between the specific contributions of ACT-R mechanisms used in IBLT from all the other mechanisms existent in ACT-R.
This dynamic complexity makes it difficult to distinguish cause and effect: for example, in patients with HAM/TSP, is the perforin content of the CTLs low because they are subject to frequent stimulation (and consequent degranulation) by the high antigen load, or conversely does the high viral load in such patients result from the low perforin content in inefficient CTLs?
For example, choosing species B, which is a distant ancestor starting at very low complexity, would not allow one to distinguish between passive or active trends, as in either case its descendants will very likely be more complex than it is.
This implies an inability to distinguish relative complexity levels of specific EBP content among the participants.
The testicular cells are heterogeneous in size and complexity, and it is difficult to distinguish populations from FSC and SSC parameters.
We present a quantitative necessary criterion based on hydrophobicity and sequence complexity assessment of TM regions to distinguish simple TMs from other cases.
Finally, we do not account for mapping or sequencing errors, library complexity, the ability of algorithms to distinguish between the reads covering both alleles of a heterozygous SV site [ 17], instances of singleton, split, and truncated reads, etc.
A key limitation of Ashby's law is that it fails to distinguish between necessary complexity (i.e., internal complexity required to adapt to a complex external environment) and unnecessary complexity (e.g., internal complexity caused by suboptimal organization design decisions) (Worren 2012).
