Sentence examples for completeness of procedures from inspiring English sources

Completeness of procedures, good medicine and advice were perceived as 'good care' in India [ 36].

In 2005, the completeness of procedures was 89% and from 2006 through 2010 it was 96% (Garellick et al. 2011, Leonardsson et al. 2012).

The perception of 'good' care is therefore a significant determinant of maternal satisfaction, with four sub-themes emerging as major determinants – length of consultation, completeness of procedures, perception of negligent care (which diminishes satisfaction) and perceived provider competence.

In addition, a previous study (Pedersen et al. 2004) reported a high validity of data in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, with 94% completeness of procedures registered and a positive predictive value of between 84% and 100% for hip diagnoses for primary total hip replacement.

To estimate completeness of procedure registration, we used the Danish National Patient Registry DNPRR) as reference standard.

Data completeness was evaluated at two levels: 1) completeness of procedure registrations and 2) completeness of variable registrations.

9 The DNPR forms the basis for hospitals financial reimbursement, and hence, the completeness of procedure registrations in the DNPR is likely high.

The completeness of procedure registration in the WDHR-CCTR was calculated as the proportion of patients registered with a cardiac CT in the DNPR from hospitals in Western Denmark that was also registered in the WDHR-CCTR.

We retrieved 2008 2012 data to examine the 1) content; 2) completeness of procedure registration using the Danish National Patient Registry as reference; 3) completeness of variable registration comparing observed vs expected numbers; and 4) positive predictive values as well as negative predictive values of 19 main patient and procedure variables.

The LROI had a good degree of completeness of registered procedures (more than 95% of primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures) in 2012 and 2013, and a high validity of the data entered.

Registration completeness of primary procedures and revisions increased from 76.6% in 1997 to 88% in 2010 for primary procedures and from 56.7% in 1997 to 88% in 2010 for revisions, compared with registration in the Danish National Registry of Patients.