completely substance

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "completely substance" is not correct in written English.
It does not convey a clear meaning and is likely a misuse of words. Example: "The report lacked completely substance, making it difficult to understand the main points."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was a vintage Cain performance: rousing, passionate, funny and almost completely substance-free.In the primaries, Mr Romney had to fear audiences like this; now they are among his strongest supporters.

The Economist

"[Marijuana is] not a completely harmless substance, and there are some risks involved".

The Guardian

But marijuana was "not a completely benign substance".That is certainly the view of the federal authorities.

The Economist

The chief executive of MAL went on camera to say it was a completely harmless substance, that it could simply be washed away with water.

The New York Times

I mean that's just crazy talk, filling a confection with a completely unrelated substance.

Huffington Post

Matter always undergoes changes during a chemical reaction, transforming it into a completely different substance.

Vice

This means people in 14 states that allow some use of marijuana -- Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington -- do not need to fear being thrown into a federal prison as they seek to free themselves of their medical condition with a completely natural substance.

Huffington Post

"If he wanted to use drugs, he would be more likely to simply add something toxic to actual cocaine, the stuff people wanted, rather than try to trick them with a completely different substance, which a 'taste' would reveal straightaway.

Vice

"If he wanted to use drugs, he would be more likely to simply add something toxic to actual cocaine, the stuff people wanted, rather than try to trick them with a completely different substance, which a 'taste' would reveal straight away.

Vice

There's no word yet on why the initial drug tests yielded multiple false positives, or why those K-9 units got thrown off, but it's certainly not the first time Florida police have mistaken a completely benign substance for junk.

Vice

The sigmoidal 4-parameter logistics curve was used for data fitting yielding an IC50 value of 121 ± 3 μM for silanetriol 2. A graphical representation of the IC50 curve clearly showing a dose dependent inhibitory effect is illustrated in Figure 2. Compounds 1– 3 are members of a simple yet pharmacologically completely unexplored substance class.

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to convey thoroughness or exhaustiveness, consider using phrases like "entirely substantial" or "fully complete" instead of the ungrammatical "completely substance".

Common error

Avoid using "substance" in a way that implies a qualifying adjective. "Substance" is a noun, so using it after "completely" creates an ungrammatical structure. Instead, use an adjective like "substantial".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "completely substance" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms that this phrase does not follow standard English grammar rules. The correct usage involves using an adjective after "completely", such as "completely substantial".

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "completely substance" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in writing. As Ludwig AI indicates, it doesn't follow standard English grammar rules. The correct way to express the intended meaning is to use an adjective after "completely", such as "completely substantial". It is important to use precise and grammatically sound language to ensure clarity and credibility in communication. Consider utilizing alternatives like "entirely substantial" or "fully substantial" to convey the intended meaning more effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

entirely substantial

Replaces "completely" with "entirely" and "substance" with the adjective "substantial" emphasizing completeness in a more grammatically sound way.

fully substantial

Replaces "completely" with "fully" and "substance" with the adjective "substantial", similarly stressing the completeness of the substance.

utterly devoid of substance

Uses "utterly devoid of" to indicate a complete absence of substance, creating a contrast to the original phrase.

entirely without substance

Expresses a lack of substance using "entirely without", emphasizing a total absence.

fully material

Replaces "substance" with "material", shifting the focus to physical existence and completeness.

wholly material

Uses "wholly" to amplify the completeness of being material, emphasizing the physical aspect.

perfectly material

Emphasizes flawless and complete materiality by using "perfectly" instead of "completely".

completely tangible

Focuses on the tangible aspect of a substance, indicating it is fully perceptible to the senses.

wholly tangible

Highlights the completeness of the tangible nature of something.

perfectly tangible

Highlights the perfect, complete, and tangible nature of something.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "completely" with a noun like "substance"?

It is grammatically incorrect to directly follow "completely" with the noun "substance". Instead, use an adjective derived from "substance", such as "substantial", as in "completely substantial".

What can I say instead of "completely substance" to indicate something lacks content?

To indicate a lack of content, use phrases like "devoid of substance" or "lacking in substance".

Is "completely substance" ever grammatically correct in English?

No, the phrase "completely substance" is not grammatically correct. "Completely" is an adverb that modifies adjectives, verbs, or other adverbs, not nouns like "substance".

How can I use "completely" to describe something related to material or substance?

You can use "completely" with adjectives like "material" or "substantial", for example, "completely material" to describe something that is entirely physical, or "completely substantial" to indicate something has significant content or value.