completely shocked

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "completely shocked" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express a strong feeling of surprise or disbelief in response to an unexpected event or information. Example: "When I heard the news about the sudden closure of the company, I was completely shocked."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Completely shocked.

Independent

We were completely shocked".

The New York Times

"I'm completely shocked.

The New York Times

"Psychiatry completely shocked me.

The Guardian

"Everyone was completely shocked.

The Guardian

"They were completely shocked.

The Guardian

We're just completely shocked".

The Guardian

They were not completely shocked.

The New Yorker

"I was just completely shocked.

The Guardian

That's why I'm completely shocked.

The Guardian - Books

Everybody's completely shocked and dismayed".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "completely shocked" to express a strong and immediate reaction to unexpected news or events. It's particularly effective when conveying a sense of disbelief or astonishment.

Common error

Avoid using "completely shocked" too frequently in your writing, as it can lose its impact. Consider using synonyms like "utterly astonished" or "totally surprised" to add variety and maintain the reader's interest.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "completely shocked" functions primarily as an adjective phrase modifying a subject to express a state of extreme surprise or disbelief. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, supported by numerous examples across various sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "completely shocked" is a grammatically sound and very common phrase used to express a strong feeling of surprise or disbelief. Ludwig AI confirms that it is suitable for neutral to informal contexts, frequently appearing in News & Media. For more formal settings, consider alternatives such as "utterly astonished". While widely used, it's best to avoid overuse to maintain impact, incorporating synonyms like "totally surprised" to add variety.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

absolutely stunned

Highlights the feeling of being overwhelmed or unable to react due to shock.

speechless with shock

Emphasizes the inability to speak due to being shocked.

utterly astonished

Emphasizes extreme surprise; suggests a higher degree of amazement than "completely shocked".

dumbfounded

Suggests being temporarily unable to speak because of astonishment.

in complete disbelief

Focuses on the inability to accept something as true.

entirely flabbergasted

Indicates extreme surprise and bewilderment.

floored

Suggests being overwhelmed or knocked off balance by surprise.

totally surprised

A more general term for experiencing surprise; less intense than "completely shocked".

taken aback

Implies a sudden and often unpleasant surprise.

thoroughly amazed

Suggests a positive surprise or wonderment.

FAQs

How can I use "completely shocked" in a sentence?

You can use "completely shocked" to express a strong feeling of surprise or disbelief. For example, "I was completely shocked when I heard the news".

What are some alternatives to "completely shocked"?

Alternatives include "utterly astonished", "totally surprised", "absolutely stunned", or "taken aback", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it okay to use "completely shocked" in formal writing?

While "completely shocked" is generally acceptable, consider using more formal alternatives like "utterly astonished" or "in complete disbelief" in academic or professional contexts for added sophistication.

What's the difference between "completely shocked" and "slightly shocked"?

"Completely shocked" indicates a very strong reaction of surprise, whereas "slightly shocked" suggests a mild level of surprise or disturbance. The degree of intensity is the key difference.