Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
"I haven't seen them use it, I'd just be completely guessing," Polis said at a news conference for the National Cannabis Industry Association, according to the Washington Post.
They were presented with the stimuli from the wake list, from the sleep list, or from a new list of completely novel items (counterbalanced across participants) and were instructed to classify each stimulus as either old or new and then rate their confidence about their decision on a scale ranging from 1 (completely guessing) to 7 (completely sure).
Similar(58)
No one expected Joe Namath would wear that awful fur coat for the coin flip in 2014 and others completely guessed that Idina Menzel would easily take over two minutes to sing the national anthem last year.
The posttest was self-paced, and participants made confidence judgments following each trial by choosing a number from 1 to 7 (1 = complete guess, 7 = completely sure).
"In that sense it's not completely shocking, I guess," Yetter said about the shooting of the 18-year-old.
That, in turn, may mean that people who had been thought to be paralysed for life can recover a limited ability to get around under their own steam.Dr Harkema was not making a completely wild guess when she started her experiments.
A completely random guess by the classifier would have resulted in points lying along the diagonal dividing the ROC space.
He did not name which ones, but I can take a completely uninformed guess: Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle, Google, Facebook.
A completely random guess would give a point along a diagonal from the point (0, 0) to (1, 1).
When representing the TPR in front of the FPR, a completely random guess would give a point along the diagonal line and points above the diagonal represent improved classification results.
Therefore a perfect classification method would give a point with the coordinate (0,1) and a completely random guess would give a point along the diagonal from point (0,0) to (1,1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com