Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
From the above, we complete this proposition.
Similar(59)
then, by (2.2) and letting we complete the proof of this proposition.
Thus, combining with (13), (14), and (18 - 20 18 - 20mplete the proof of this proposition.
Thus, combining with (23 - 28 23 - 28mplete the proof of this proposition.
This completes the proof of this proposition.
It completes the proof of this proposition.
The proof of this proposition is complete.
Then, by (1.1) itself, we can conclude that | u ( x, t 1 ) − u ( x, t 2 ) | ≤ C | t 1 − t 2 | α / 4. holds for any given ( x, t 1 ), ( x, t 2 ) ∈ Q T. The proof of this proposition is complete.
In connection with I λ ( u, v ) ≥ 0 and Proposition 3.1, we complete this proof.
But unless you have excess inventory, like we did, or insane margins, or you do real volume with them, you need to consider it a complete advertising proposition".
Since the space ( X, G ) is G-complete, then ( X, d G ) is complete (see Proposition 10 in [7]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com