Sentence examples for complete inequality from inspiring English sources

On the Gini scale, 0 represents complete equality and 1 represents complete inequality.

This measures the inequality of income among households, with zero signifying complete equality and 1 complete inequality.

The complete inequality ensuring tolerance synthesis is obtained by adding the defects of all junctions forming the vector loop.

(The Gini coefficient is a measure of income inequality that ranges between 0, indicating perfect equality, and 100, indicating complete inequality).

The Gini coefficient of income inequality (where 0 represents complete equality and 1 complete inequality) rose from 0.24 in the late 1980s to 0.41 a decade later, according to research quoted in Espacio Laical, a magazine published by Cuba's Catholic church.

And although our data for the past are quite tentative and in some cases not much better than guesses, it is still the first time since 1820 that global inequality is deemed to have gone down, from approximately 69 Gini points to around 64. (On the Gini scale, 100 would be complete inequality while 0 would be complete equality).

5.09pm GMT Obama: 'the hills of Appalachia to the quiet lanes of Newtown' And then, Obama says, America's journey is not complete while inequality remains – followed by a reference to the killings at Sandy Hook school: For our journey is not complete until our wives, our mothers, and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts.

end{aligned} (18) By the Schur complete lemma [25], inequality (10) is equivalent to (Phi_{2}

Via the method of convex geometric analysis, a complete proof of inequality (26) with equality condition is given in [9].

Now, using the fact that f is a relative semi-convex function and applying the change of variable technique on the right-hand side of the above inequality completes the proof.

Reusing Theorem 1.1 on x p j and replacing x ij by f j (x ij ) in Theorem 1.1, we obtain ∏ j = 1 m f j ( x 1 j ) - ∑ i = 2 n f j ( x i j ) ≤ ∏ j = 1 m f j ( x 1 j ) p j - ∑ i = 2 n f j ( x i j ) p j 1 p j, which completes the first inequality of (6).