Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(23)
Then is an ordered and complete gauge space.
Also, ((X,mathcal{T}(mathcal{F}))) is a complete gauge space.
Theorem 3.2 Let ( X, ℱ, ≼ ) be an ordered complete gauge space satisfying the assumption (H).
Let X be a complete gauge structure ({d_{n}mid n inmathbb{N} }) satisfying condition (1).
Let be an ordered complete gauge space and be an operator.
Let X be endowed with a complete gauge structure ({d_{n}mid n in mathbb{N} }) satisfying condition (1).
Similar(37)
The completed gauge should make clear to the viewer how the focus area has changed over the three years.
If ( X, P ) is a left (right) -sequentially complete quasi-gauge space and is symmetric, i.e., ∀ α ∈ A ∀ u, v ∈ X { J α ( u, v ) = J α ( v, u ) }, then ( X, T ) is left (right) partially -admissible on X.
If ( X, P ) is a left (right) -sequentially complete quasi-gauge space, then a set-valued dynamic system ( X, T ), T : X → 2 X, is left (right) -admissible on X.
If every left (right) -Cauchy sequence ( u m : m ∈ N ) in X is left (right) -convergent in X (i.e., S ( u m : m ∈ N ) L − J ≠ ∅ ( S ( u m : m ∈ N ) R − J ≠ ∅ )), then ( X, P ) is called a left (right) -sequentially complete quasi-gauge space.
(b) If ( X, P ) is a left (right) -sequentially complete quasi-gauge space and is symmetric, i.e., ∀ α ∈ A ∀ u, v ∈ X { J α ( u, v ) = J α ( v, u ) }, then ( X, T ) is left (right) partially -admissible on X. (c) It is evident that each left (right) partially -admissible on X a set-valued dynamic system ( X, T ) is left (right) -admissible on X but the converse not necessarily holds. .
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com