"complementary points" is a correct and usable term in written English.
It can be used to refer to two points or ideas that both add to an overall picture or understanding, without either one being more important than the other. For example, "This article makes complementary points about the importance of both exercise and diet in maintaining a healthy lifestyle."
Complexity in natural systems is examined from complementary points of view, including scientific, historical, philosophical and literary.
Secondly, it proposes the approach of geometric analysis of the distribution networks as complementary points of the former optimization methods.
The document as a whole through its fixed and recurrent literary structures makes two complementary points: (1) reason unaided by scripture produces uncertain propositions, and (2) reason operating within the limits of Scripture produces truth.
At this point, you can identify potential overlaps, add complementary points, adjust timing, and assign presenters to the appropriate sections.
Accordingly, one can take advantage of complementary points of view on the same data.
This paper deals with the question of the knowledge necessary to the achievement of simulation in a design context and aims at bringing a global and complementary point of view to the classical approach.
The results obtained in the two contexts are complementary, pointing out distinct affordances and user behaviors (e.g., on browsing designs) that depend on the characteristics of each context, while also bringing to light the relevance of LdShake's social network related features.
Bennett sees football and his art as complementary, pointing to the creativity, the discipline and the teamwork of the sport.
But students also realize the complementary point that they cannot predict the way several changes accrue over many generations.
From a complementary point of view, it is known that a certain boundary value problem can be solved using a particular type of integral transform having an appropriate kernel.
While van Fraassen's (2008) does not take a position on pluralism vs. monism (and as an empiricist and antirealist van Fraassen would not have to), its emphasis on the partiality and perspective dependence of measurement provides a complementary point of entry to such diversity.
