Sentence examples for complementarity value from inspiring English sources

Every place has biodiversity, but its contribution to the global option values of biodiversity is indicated by its complementarity value, not its total diversity.

It is the comparison of the place's current complementarity value to the other values/opportunities in that place that matters when considering trade-offs at a regional scale.

The relative complementarity value (say, of a place) is not the relative number of different species but the relative amount of the hierarchy of variation gained in that place.

The early foundations of that regional biodiversity-plus-costs framework include some little-explored aspects that could enhance the common ground of biodiversity and ecosystem services: here, planning includes land/water uses offering ecosystem services or other benefits, combined with only "partial protection" of biodiversity (implying some lower complementarity value).

In the docked complex, FGAΔFL bound to the stretch which includes one of the core fibrillization motifs at the C-terminal half helical region i.e. SNNFGAIL (hIAPP20 27) with a shape complementarity value (Sc) of 0.83 indicating that hIAPP and the inhibitor have complementary binding surfaces.

At issue are the empirical and "conventional" elements involved in estimating complementarity values.

Management focussed on biological integrity will be critical for the persistence of biodiversity in those places recognised as having high complementarity values.

Decision making (for example, deciding whether we should invest in conservation of area A or area B) may require only estimates of relative gains in represented variation offered by different places (their "complementarity" values).

We can apply the same complementarity principle to species not places, as in the example of complementarity values at the underlying feature level estimated from phylogenetic pattern (a general conceptual model for complementarity at different levels of biodiversity is found in Faith 1994).

Thus, quantifying complementarity values provides the ability to balance these with other kinds of values, through the political process and the use of tools such as multi-criteria analyses [e.g., see A Biodiversity Conservation Plan for Papua New Guinea Based on Biodiversity Trade-offs Analysis] that work with values naturally expressed in different measurement units.

For example, given some subset of species that are well-protected, and two species in that taxonomic group that are endangered, the priority for conservation investment may depend on the relative gains in feature diversity (the complementarity values) expected for each species.