Sentence examples for competitive harms from inspiring English sources

"The hypothesized competitive harms from the combination of AOL's internet service and Time Warner's content and broadband facilities has not materialized," he wrote.

"This remedy," the document says, "has the best chance of preventing future competitive harms and ameliorating some of the harm already done" while at the same time "it avoids burdensome regulation and minimizes ongoing judicial supervision and involvement.

The US mission to the EU also "noted with concern" the draft motion stating that "it is important that the process of identifying competitive harms and potential remedies be based on objective and impartial findings and not be politicised".

This remedy, which is supported by affidavits from three distinguished economists, an expert computer science professor, two leading investment bankers, and an experienced computer and technology consultant to large businesses, has the best chance of preventing future competitive harms and ameliorating some of the harm already done by Microsoft.

The breakup, the government said at the time, "has the best chance of preventing future competitive harms and ameliorating some of the harm already done" while at the same time "it avoids burdensome regulation and minimizes ongoing judicial supervision and involvement".

We also have demonstrated the absence of serious competitive harms arising out of the transaction".

Disclosing details of its compensation practices "would result in significant competitive harm," Sotheby's said.

The two airlines convinced the Justice Department that there was too little overlap between them to cause any competitive harm.

Google's search service, by contrast, is "free and anyone who wants to use it can use it," said Herbert Hovenkamp, an antitrust expert at the University of Iowa College of Law, so higher prices for consumers — a hallmark of competitive harm — is not an issue.

She said that the S.E.C. would conduct "rigorous economic analysis" before putting the rules in place, to make sure they would not impose "unnecessary burdens or competitive harm" on the financial companies.

The appeals judges also defined a standard for weighing competitive harm against consumer benefits in deciding whether a product-bundling decision of a monopolist, like Microsoft, should be permitted.