competitive harm

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "competitive harm" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to any negative impact or damage on a company or its competitiveness in the market. Example: The new pricing strategy implemented by our competitor has caused significant competitive harm to our business, resulting in a decrease in sales and profits.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

Disclosing details of its compensation practices "would result in significant competitive harm," Sotheby's said.

The New York Times - Arts

The two airlines convinced the Justice Department that there was too little overlap between them to cause any competitive harm.

The New Yorker

She said that the S.E.C. would conduct "rigorous economic analysis" before putting the rules in place, to make sure they would not impose "unnecessary burdens or competitive harm" on the financial companies.

The New Yorker

The appeals judges also defined a standard for weighing competitive harm against consumer benefits in deciding whether a product-bundling decision of a monopolist, like Microsoft, should be permitted.

The New York Times

The agency's rules, he added, abide by the Freedom of Information Act, which provides that agencies not disclose trade secrets and confidential commercial information that, if made public, would cause the company substantial competitive harm.

The New York Times

Companies were required to outline the performance measures they used to determine bonuses, but the rules also allowed those who feared disclosure could cause "competitive harm" to opt out — and many companies used the loophole.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

"The hypothesized competitive harms from the combination of AOL's internet service and Time Warner's content and broadband facilities has not materialized," he wrote.

The New York Times

"This remedy," the document says, "has the best chance of preventing future competitive harms and ameliorating some of the harm already done" while at the same time "it avoids burdensome regulation and minimizes ongoing judicial supervision and involvement.

The New York Times

The US mission to the EU also "noted with concern" the draft motion stating that "it is important that the process of identifying competitive harms and potential remedies be based on objective and impartial findings and not be politicised".

The Guardian - Tech

This remedy, which is supported by affidavits from three distinguished economists, an expert computer science professor, two leading investment bankers, and an experienced computer and technology consultant to large businesses, has the best chance of preventing future competitive harms and ameliorating some of the harm already done by Microsoft.

The New York Times

The breakup, the government said at the time, "has the best chance of preventing future competitive harms and ameliorating some of the harm already done" while at the same time "it avoids burdensome regulation and minimizes ongoing judicial supervision and involvement".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In legal or business contexts, clearly define the specific actions or outcomes that constitute "competitive harm" to ensure a well-supported argument or analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "competitive harm" when you only mean that a competitor has been negatively affected. "Competitive harm" refers to damage to the overall competitive process, not just individual businesses.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "competitive harm" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or preposition in legal, business, and economic contexts. It describes a negative impact on the competitive process within a market. Ludwig AI identifies its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "competitive harm" is a noun phrase used to describe actions that negatively impact the competitive process within a market. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used in news, business, and legal contexts. It's important to distinguish "competitive harm" from simply harming a competitor, as the former refers to broader market effects. When discussing potential antitrust issues, use "competitive harm" to denote actions that negatively impact market competition. Alternatives include "damage to competition", "anticompetitive effects", and "market distortion".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

damage to competition

Focuses on the damage inflicted upon the overall competitive landscape.

anticompetitive effects

Highlights the effects that hinder or prevent competition.

market distortion

Emphasizes the imbalance or irregularity introduced into the market.

competitive disadvantage

Underscores the loss of an advantageous position relative to competitors.

erosion of competitiveness

Highlights the gradual decline in a company's ability to compete.

detriment to competition

Focuses on the detrimental impact on the competitive environment.

impairment of market dynamics

Emphasizes the compromised functionality of market forces.

competitive weakening

Indicates a reduction in a company's strength in the market.

adverse impact on competition

Highlights the negative consequences affecting competitive balance.

undermining of competitive advantage

Focuses on the loss of a key factor that sets a company apart.

FAQs

How does "competitive harm" differ from harming a competitor?

"Competitive harm" refers to damage to the overall competitive process, such as reducing consumer choice or increasing prices. Harming a competitor, on the other hand, simply means negatively impacting a single business, which isn't necessarily illegal unless it also causes "damage to competition".

What are some examples of actions that could cause "competitive harm"?

Examples include anti-competitive mergers that create monopolies, predatory pricing, and "market distortion" strategies that unfairly disadvantage smaller businesses or new entrants.

What legal frameworks address "competitive harm"?

Antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act in the United States, are designed to prevent actions that cause "competitive harm". These laws aim to protect consumers by ensuring fair competition and preventing monopolies.

What can I say instead of "competitive harm"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "anticompetitive effects", "market distortion", or "competitive disadvantage" to describe similar situations.