Sentence examples for competing exposures from inspiring English sources

For this reason the analytical models exploring each of the exposure variables (birth weight and exposure to the occupation) included slightly different covariates acting as potential confounders and/or competing exposures.

Given of the time frame from exposure to follow-up, this hypothesis was predicated on any prenatal effect being robust enough to persist despite competing exposures during infancy and childhood.

Thus, although our chosen alloyed gold standard is contaminated by measurement error, it was obtained without resorting to the assumptions that are used in the competing exposure assessment methods.

It is important to note that the interpretation of the estimated hazard ratios for potential confounders is not straightforward since the main exposure variable (birth weight) lies on the pathway between these potential confounders and the outcome variable (CVD in later life). 2 Exposure to the 1940 45 occupation was considered a competing exposure.

The exception was exposure to the occupation, which would act as a competing exposure in analyses exploring the relationship between birth weight and CVD in later life, since it did not precede birth weight in this cohort and was not considered to be directly related to birth weight in the causal path diagram [ 20].

These include causal interactions, imperfect experiments, adjustment for confounding, time-varying exposures, competing risks and the probability of causation.

Teaching is a top priority, and faculty members compete for exposure to students.

This will lead to competing interests from multiple exposures, which will later act as a confounding factor for the outcome.

This is partly because of low awareness of the health implications of these exposures and competing attention from infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS and malaria.

Without individual-level data on specific chemical exposures and competing risk factors over long latency periods, the few associations seen to date are more likely due to multiple comparisons and presence of competing risk factors than to the unmasking of a true exposure effect.

Drawing on Hilgartner's concept of a 'risk object', the paper reveals how a search for a policy consensus on auditor liability was invariably frustrated by the competing conceptualizations of, and exposure to, risk attributed to particular proposed liability arrangements.