"compelling review" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to a review or evaluation that is convincing, persuasive, or engaging. It can be used to describe a review of a product, book, movie, or other piece of art or media. Here is an example of its usage in a sentence: "The New York Times gave a compelling review of the latest novel by bestselling author, John Smith, calling it a captivating and thought-provoking read."
Margaret Chan, director general of the World Health Organisation, called it "a thorough and compelling review" which tackled "the burning need to find incentives that can get new products into the pipeline".
But, still on the subject of Dawn... Dan Mendelsohn, in this mean but compelling review of the series three years ago, wrote: "Although much has been made of the show's treatment of race, the 'treatment' is usually little more than a lazy allusion – race never really makes anything happen in the show".
In a compelling review, P. Olivier et al. first describe the trophic effect of vitamin D in the skeletal muscle.
Reviewer #1: Dr. I. King Jordan, Georgia Institute of Technology Igor Rogozin and colleagues have written a comprehensive, synthetic and compelling review mainly covering the 'evolution' of spliceosomal introns.
Among the book's more compelling reviews was one written by May Sarton for the Boston Evening Transcript.
Letterboxd is a fantastic website if you want to keep track of movies you've watched, read compelling reviews or build and share movie lists.
In a compelling law review article, Professor Taunya Lovell Banks, a former civil rights attorney, writes about how many of the Blacks who drowned, during Hurricane Katrina, likely couldn't swim.
It follows the spring publication of Brill's compelling, widely reviewed book America's Bitter Pill: Money, Politics, Backroom Deals, and the Fight to Fix Our Broken Healthcare System (Random House, 2015).
The choice to test non-musician participants was motivated by compelling evidence reviewed by Bigand & Poulin-Charronnat [52], in support of the idea that day-to-day normal exposure to music teaches non-musicians to implicitly process the structural aspects of music according to similar principles (although less explicitly) as individuals who have received extensive musical training.
The changing roles and rewards for corporate directors create another compelling reason to review board performance regularly.
Gavil and First offer us a bundle of reading opportunities: a compelling and cogent review of U.S. enforcement actions against Microsoft as well as an insightful and provocative analysis of four enforcement actors: the U.S. Department of Justice, the states' Attorney Generals, non-U.S.
