"compelling phenomenon" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe something remarkable or remarkable and hard to resist, especially when you want to emphasize the power the thing has to make people think about it and take action. For example: "The ongoing pandemic is a compelling phenomenon that has had a profound impact on people's daily lives."
Skepticism is at its best when its advocates do not try to cut off research or close down conversation of a subject but instead explore possible new (or old) ways to understand and verify strange but compelling phenomena.
Mr. Erdogan, a 57-year-old former mayor of Istanbul, has emerged as perhaps the most compelling political phenomenon here in generations.
Imagine No Possessions is a fascinating analysis of the early Soviet socialist object as a uniquely compelling historical phenomenon, and as the key to a reevaluation of Russian Constructivism.
Most philosophers today still find the physicalist explanation more compelling: that mental phenomena have a physiological or a neurophysiological basis.
As a former boss of Carlson at the Weekly Standard, Kristol has some proprietary insight into one of the most compelling Trump-era phenomena at Fox News: Carlson himself, who holds down the 8 p.m. slot at the network, the former turf of self-described Fox News "table-setter" and fallen King of Cable News Bill O'Reilly.
structure; the World Wide Web serves as perhaps the most compelling example of this phenomenon.
In The Religious Aspect of Philosophy Royce took the experience of error — a particularly compelling aspect of the phenomenon of knowing — as the starting point for his own transcendental argument.
However, a mechanism-level of investigation requires the investment of substantial resources, time, and effort, and obtaining the requisite funding requires compelling evidence that the phenomenon does, in fact, exist and needs to be explained.
That controversy very much represents the clash between the cultures of science and the law, and in light of that controversy it seems appropriate, indeed compelling, to put the phenomenon of unintentional seeding into a proper scientific perspective in this Review.
The title is compelling, but the three phenomena it lists vacillation, indecision and hesitation are not clearly distinguished in the manuscript.
