Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(55)
Comparisons with results from experts are reported, and they show a high similarity.
Comparisons with results from other studies for the case of horizontal cavity show a good agreement.
Validation for both versions included comparisons with results obtained using reference LC UV methods.
Then the effectiveness and accuracy are validated through comparisons with results from open available literature.
The method has been validated by comparisons with results from finite-element simulations with good agreement.
Several alternative allocations are calculated and comparisons with results available in the literature are presented.
Similar(5)
Comparison with results existing in the literature is shown.
Additionally, comparison with results for the Antarctic Circumpolar Current suggests that the same scaling holds in both cases.
Figures 4(b) and 5 show the band structures and densities of states (DOS), respectively, together with a comparison with results from Umari10.
The model was validated by comparison with results from lab-scale experiments.
Comparison with results on a battery of other clinical function tests was assessed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com