Sentence examples for comparisons were evaluated by from inspiring English sources

These reports were analysed in order to determine how many endpoint-related comparisons were evaluated by clinical studies, how many by RCTs and how many by methodologically reliable RCTs.

Between groups comparisons were evaluated by means of the Kruskall-Wallis analysis to compare the age, duration of diseases, and pain intensity.

Pairwise comparisons were evaluated by two tailed t-tests, repeated measures by two-way ANOVA with the factors time×genotype followed by Bonferroni post-hoc tests.

Comparisons were evaluated by unpaired t-test.

Group comparisons were evaluated by the analysis of variance test with post hoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test.

Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. Comparisons were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Prism software.

Significance between multiple comparisons was evaluated by one-way ANOVA.

Significance between two comparisons was evaluated by independent-samples T test.

The number of differentially expressed genes in the 21-5 vs. 21-5c (dataset 1) and 21-5 vs. Huh-7 (dataset 2) comparisons was evaluated by filtering data using a signal/noise (S/N) ratio > 3.0 in 75% of replicates in at least one tested sample group (either 21-5 or 21-5c and either 21-5 or Huh-7) and p ≤ 0.05.

Potential inconsistency of the network, defined as the variability of results across the direct and indirect evidence comparisons, was evaluated by the node split method and the relative bayesian P value, measuring agreement between direct and indirect evidence for each split node.

The photovoltaic properties of active layers based on OBHJ and PBHJ for comparison were evaluated by fabricating solar cell with a conventional device structure as shown in Scheme 2.