Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Analyzing the correlation of the clinical subphenotypes and the alleles, none of the comparisons (cases with each clinical phenotype vs. those without) showed any statistical significance, likely because of the insufficient statistical power caused by the limited sample size after stratification.
In the association analysis with the clinical subsets, none of the case-only comparisons (cases with each clinical phenotype versus those without) reached statistical significance, partly because of the insufficient statistical power caused by the small sample size due to stratification.
Similar(58)
Excellent agreement is documented in all comparison cases.
Some of the comparison cases had extraordinary sequences of good luck yet showed a spectacular ability to fritter that luck away.
The comparison cases were matched on age at diagnosis, stage of cancer at diagnosis and at time of pregnancy, and year of treatment.
All the 27 combinations were evaluated with three different impact assessment methods (generating 81 comparison cases): IPCC 2007 100 years, Ecological Footprint and ReCiPe 2008 H.
The derived model was consistent in both comparison cases.
Since a borderline must be drawn somewhere, it would seem hard to avoid such comparison cases.
The criterion for identifying comparison cases was based on shared mechanism of injury.
If controls are successful, then these prior earnings should not differ for treated and matched comparison cases.
The results from the model were coherent with the results of average water saturation in each comparison cases.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com