Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
comparison to previously
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "comparison to previously" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and lacks clarity. Example: "In comparison to previously established standards, the new guidelines are more effective."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
A slightly modified campaign is a small price to pay and pales in comparison to previously affected films.
News & Media
In comparison to previously documented studies, this work has substantially reduced the treatment time necessary for decolorization of dyes.
Science
However, it is more demanding in terms of resource usage in comparison to previously described protocol-based approaches.
Introducing NGS technology to the laboratory creates a need for additional IT infrastructure in comparison to previously introduced technologies.
Science
Anyway, in comparison to previously published electrochemical data [9, 18], the substitution influences more oxidation than reduction (more HOMO than LUMO).
Science
Results demonstrate that the method can generate effective neural architectures in substantially fewer evaluations in comparison to previously published neuroevolutionary techniques.
Science
In comparison to previously reported work we have obtained ultra-broadband supercontinuum spectra using relatively very low peak power of incident pulses.
Science
The transformation frequency per number of conidia was between two and four orders of magnitude higher in comparison to previously published methods.
Science
In comparison to previously demonstrated lens actuation mechanism, the reported mechanism shows higher resonant frequency and hence suited for faster actuation.
Moreover, novelties regarding mainly the probes and the target rDNA region have allowed sensitivity improvements in comparison to previously published studies.
A one order of magnitude detectability enhancement in comparison to previously reported gold colloid immunochromatographic assays for this toxin was obtained.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When drawing parallels with prior findings, use "compared to previously" or "relative to previously" instead of "comparison to previously". This ensures grammatical correctness.
Common error
Do not use the noun "comparison" followed by "to previously"; it's grammatically unsound. Replace it with "compared to" or "relative to" for clarity and correctness.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "comparison to previously" functions as a prepositional phrase aiming to establish a relationship between the current subject and something that existed or occurred earlier. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not correct in standard written English.
Frequent in
Science
87%
News & Media
8%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "comparison to previously" is frequently found in various contexts, especially within scientific literature, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect. The intended purpose is to relate new information to prior knowledge, often in a formal and scientific setting. To ensure grammatical accuracy, it is recommended to use alternatives like "compared to previously" or "relative to previously".
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
compared with earlier
Replaces 'previously' with 'earlier' for a more concise expression.
relative to prior
Uses 'relative to' instead of 'comparison to', and 'prior' instead of 'previously'.
in relation to past
Emphasizes the connection to the past, replacing 'comparison' with 'relation'.
assessed against former
More formal and emphasizes evaluation against a former state.
evaluated against earlier
Similar to 'assessed against former', but using 'evaluated'.
in contrast to what came before
Highlights a contrast with what preceded it.
juxtaposed with earlier
More formal, suggesting a side-by-side comparison.
when contrasted with past
Introduces the comparison as a conditional statement.
differentiating from historic
Focuses on the act of distinguishing from a historical precedent.
unlike preceding
Directly indicates a dissimilarity with what came before.
FAQs
How can I correctly use "comparison" in a sentence about previous data?
Instead of "comparison to previously", structure your sentence to use "compared to" or "in comparison with" followed by the previous data or findings.
Is it grammatically correct to say "comparison to previously"?
No, "comparison to previously" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is "compared to previously" or "relative to previously".
What are some alternatives to "comparison to previously" that maintain a formal tone?
Alternatives such as "relative to prior", "in relation to past", or "assessed against former" offer formal alternatives to "comparison to previously".
What's the difference between "comparison to previously" and "compared to previously"?
"Comparison to previously" is grammatically incorrect. "Compared to previously" is the correct phrasing when you're drawing a parallel or contrast with something that occurred before.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested