Sentence examples for comparison panel from inspiring English sources

Six out of the nine probes that hybridized with a FC of 3.6-fold or more in the 12-h comparison (panel "higher in infected") also hybridized significantly more strongly in the 18-h comparison.

For visual comparison, panels A and B are overlaid in Figure 2C, demonstrating how the three components combine to mimic a power law distribution.

For the labMT-LIWC comparison in Panel E of Figure 1 we examine the same matched word lists as before.

At time 5, a comparison with panel B shows that the model population is still some distance from the stable population implied by the prevailing rates.

For the labMT-OL comparison in Panel E of Figure 1 we again examine the same matched word lists as before (except the neutral word list because OL has no explicit neutral words).

Looking at the labMT-MPQA comparison in Panel D of Figure 1, we see that more of the matches are between words without stems (blue) than those with stems (green), and that each score in −1, 0, +1 from MPQA corresponds to a wider range of scores in labMT.

The demand for illuminated manuscripts declined towards the end of the century, perhaps because of the costly production process in comparison to panel painting.

For comparison, in panel B we show the correspondence between stimulus slope at burst onset and n.

In comparison to panel A, here the actual values of ΔΦcap are given, i.e., here the experimental data are scaled to the simulation instead of rescaling the simulations to the experiments as during the optimization process.

Comparison of panel c and d of Figure 3 reveals also more subtle differences between the profiles at positions which refer to WC pairings in both, the PM-GG (panel c) and PM-G'G (panel d) duplexes: Firstly, triple TTT provide the largest intensities for the former duplexes whereas triple CCC become largest in PM-G'G duplexes.

The RNFL and VF comparison in panel E agrees.