Sentence examples for comparison of utilization from inspiring English sources

Fig. 7 Comparison of utilization ratios for voice traffic (CBR) that are obtained using knapsack, fuzzy, and GRAMAKA Fig. 8 Comparison of utilization ratios for video traffic (VBR) that are obtained using knapsack, fuzzy, and GRAMAKA Fig. 9 Comparison of utilization ratios for data traffic (VBR) obtained using knapsack, fuzzy, and GRAMAKA.

While Figure 2 allowed for comparison of utilization for beneficiaries with specific conditions, Figure 3 displays the comparison of utilization for beneficiaries with multiple conditions.

For further comparison of utilization across conditions, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for each care setting.

A comparison of utilization patterns between SEER-based and claims-based measures suggested avenues for improving sensitivity.

Non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests were used for comparison of utilization between pre- and post-intervention periods.

ORs were also calculated for the comparison of utilization likelihood for beneficiaries with multiple conditions to beneficiaries with none of the six conditions.

Comparisons of utilization across conditions are presented for the most frequently used settings of care.

Bivariate comparisons of odds of service were assessed via analysis of variance methods and bivariate comparisons of utilization and costs were assessed by the Cuzick extension of the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for three or more groups [ 6].

This reduced the resource utilization of ESHN. Figure 13 Comparison of resource utilization RU for the COST-266 network.

Fig. 1 Comparison of CPU utilization Fig. 2 Comparison of log buffer utilization.

Figure 7 Comparison of slot utilization.